Search for: "State v. Doctor"
Results 7421 - 7440
of 9,600
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Mar 2015, 7:31 am
His friendships and emotional state were negatively impacted. [read post]
22 Dec 2015, 10:36 am
Harris v. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 12:05 pm
Kelly, 42 Ohio App. 3d 184 (1987). [4] Freels v. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 12:56 pm
Despite a favorable decision in The Medical Center at Elizabeth Place, LLC v. [read post]
14 Jan 2010, 11:09 am
” Glaxo, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Sep 2010, 4:27 pm
* Doctor's Associates, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jan 2010, 9:53 am
Bank v. [read post]
26 Aug 2009, 3:55 am
(Emphasis added.)This decision is in one sense unsurprising: past decisions such as State (D&D) v. [read post]
16 May 2018, 12:52 pm
A doctor noted the same thing. [read post]
14 Sep 2021, 5:37 pm
B.B. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 5:00 am
For the reasons why other courts disagree, we recommend reading Alm v. [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 7:00 am
” Why he once heard of a $127 million dollar case against a doctor. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 7:04 am
Additional Resources: Ridley v. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 1:23 pm
A unit of state government is immune from suit and liability unless the state consents. [read post]
24 Feb 2021, 1:57 pm
FTC v. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 11:13 am
To highlight this position, the Court referred to the Seventh Circuit decision of Mead Johnson v Abbot Laboratories (2000) where the Court considered whether the phrase "1st Choice of Doctors" could be misleading (picture, left - picture of the product with the blue ribbon in left hand corner). [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 10:22 am
In addition, Directive 293 stated that TRICARE providers could be subject to OFCCP jurisdiction. [read post]
6 Mar 2019, 9:21 am
In fact, doctors in the state at the time were increasing – and that trend has continued. [read post]
4 Aug 2017, 10:30 am
Comprised of doctors across the state, the association presents research outlining the negative health effects of smoking. [read post]
23 Feb 2021, 5:01 am
Those hypotheticals are implicated by Van Buren v. [read post]