Search for: "State v. Doctor"
Results 7421 - 7440
of 9,600
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Mar 2011, 9:41 am
HANEY v. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 6:42 am
The defendants in the case of Heacock v. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 6:07 am
Supreme Court decision in Morrison v. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 3:46 am
In the application, Nutley stated had no weakness in his hands. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 2:15 pm
Hernandez v. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 2:08 pm
Because the state apparently has only one clinic that offers non-emergency abortions, and the doctor who performs them comes in from out of state only once a week, the law effectively amounts to a one-week waiting period for an abortion. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 11:38 am
The recent decision of Tayag v. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 9:00 am
Medical malpractice case v. doctor and hospital. [read post]
26 Mar 2011, 12:09 pm
Case in point is the recent decision of Leslie v. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 8:29 pm
Graham v. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 3:00 am
In Holmes v. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 12:18 pm
A "causal relationship" under the state consumer fraud statute, requires that prescribing doctors "relied on a misrepresentation in deciding to prescribe Risperdal" or that the TPPs relies "in deciding to place Risperdal on their formulary. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 5:02 am
“After the judge makes a determination as to damages, we will consider our options,” Panico said in his statement.The case is State of South Carolina v. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 1:22 pm
V. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 9:37 am
An Arkansas jury slapped the auto insurance giant with a $21 million verdict for compensatory and punitive damages, and the Supreme Court of Arkansas upheld the verdict in Allstate Insurance Company v. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 6:03 am
In Rumbin v. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 5:44 am
American Board of Internal Medicine v. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 5:08 am
Risperdal is different from other antipsychotic medicines and “doctors needed to know that,” he added.Jurors will begin deliberating the case tomorrow.The case is State of South Carolina v. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 4:00 am
The opinion does not state whether the mother received Demerol before birth. [read post]
20 Mar 2011, 11:08 am
For a case discussing the difference in different health care provider situations, see Stalcup v. [read post]
