Search for: "State v. Register" Results 7421 - 7440 of 13,701
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 May 2014, 8:38 am by WIMS
Appeals Court Environmental Decisions   <> National Association of Manufacturers v. [read post]
9 May 2014, 12:36 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The tests on machine were to ensure that accurate results were registered when taken as such it was used for administrative purpose or regulatory reasons. [read post]
9 May 2014, 10:56 am
§1125• Count V [sic]: Unfair Competition Under Indiana State Law• Count VI: Civil Action Under the Indiana Crime Victims ActBest Chairs ask for injunctive relief; damages, including treble damages; costs, including attorneys' fees; an order directing the destruction or alteration of all materials found to infringe Best Chairs' intellectual property; and interest, including prejudgment interest. [read post]
8 May 2014, 12:49 pm by Debra A. McCurdy
” CMS directs surveyors to “[v]erify that supervision of the radiology services is restricted to a radiologist who is a member of the medical staff. [read post]
7 May 2014, 4:37 pm by Venkat Balasubramani
Morgan Employer Fails to State Stored Communications Act Claims Absent Allegations That Employees Interfered With Company Accounts – Castle Megastore v. [read post]
7 May 2014, 4:04 pm by Giles Peaker
The Admin Court considered Bakewell Management Ltd v Brandwood [2004] UKHL 14 as a foundation of Smith. [read post]
7 May 2014, 2:25 am
This is what the General Court concluded, referring to Case T-418/07 LIBRO v OHIM – Causley (LiBRO), and confirming the approach adopted in Specsavers. [read post]
6 May 2014, 8:42 am by WIMS
Appeals Court Environmental Decisions   <> Monroe Energy, LLC v. [read post]
5 May 2014, 6:16 am by Howard Knopf
(page 83, footnote omitted)On the escrow payment system, the Register’s Report states: Most other commenters strongly disfavored the Canadian approach, and also opposed an escrow system of any kind. [read post]
1 May 2014, 3:19 pm
Case T 647/11 Asos plc v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM), Roger Maier, a decision of the General Court of the European Union (Seventh Chamber) this past Tuesday, is just one piece in a rather larger jigsaw of interlocking litigation between two assertive brand owners. [read post]