Search for: "State v. Self" Results 7421 - 7440 of 15,623
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jan 2016, 12:14 pm by Bradley McAllister
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website] ruled [opinion, PDF] unanimously Monday in Menominee Indian Tribe of Wisconsin v. [read post]
24 Jan 2016, 12:00 pm by Guest Blogger
But the basic libertarian impulse translates: the state should, in general, limit itself to enabling autonomous self-governance by workers and companies. [read post]
24 Jan 2016, 10:22 am by Guest Blogger
 But because the Constitution gives Congress authority to govern non-state territories, the Supreme Court’s century-old decision in Grafton v. [read post]
23 Jan 2016, 10:50 am by JB
The Constitution is silent on how to fulfil this duty, leaving the question to all three branches of government consistent with their institutional roles.An aside: In Luther v. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 7:43 pm by Bill Marler
To improve surveillance, the Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists has recommended that all L. monocytogenes isolates be forwarded to state public health laboratories for subtyping through the National Molecular Subtyping Network for Foodborne Disease Surveillance (PulseNet). [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 11:45 am by Native American Rights Fund
Courts of Appeals Bulletin http://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/cta/2016cta.htmlU.S. v. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 8:12 am by John Elwood
And while the Sunflower State won big this week in Kansas v. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 5:57 am by Guest Blogger
  These arguments often spoke in the register of the affirmative constitutional duty of legislators to act, rather than the register more familiar today, of constitutional constraints on what the state can do. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 7:02 am by Joy Waltemath
The Oregon State Medical Board brought a disciplinary action against him because of his use of alcohol while he was on call. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 7:00 am by Joy Waltemath
Although Temple argued that the employee’s deposition testimony about the alleged statements was self-serving and unsubstantiated, the court observed that it up to a jury to assess the employee’s credibility. [read post]