Search for: "State v. Still" Results 7421 - 7440 of 44,727
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Apr 2011, 1:26 pm by Richard D. Friedman
Further proof that the death of Crawford has been greatly exaggerated comes in the form of a recent decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, United States v. [read post]
20 Jun 2008, 8:30 pm
Moreover, even if their claims rested upon AT&T's pre-PDA decision to adjust their NCS date for pregnancy leave, respondents argue that the decision below should still stand based on Lorance v. [read post]
11 Oct 2007, 8:18 am
The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) published Examination Guidelines to help examiners make decisions regarding the obviousness (or lack thereof) of claimed inventions in light of the Supreme Court's recent decision in KSR International Co. v. [read post]
22 May 2015, 7:10 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
In determining habitual residence, it stated that the focus is upon the situation of the child; the intentions of the parents being merely one of the relevant factors. [read post]
17 Sep 2008, 5:30 pm
We get up on our high horse sometimes.Let's not forget that as recently as five years ago, some of the United States still retained criminal statutes that penalized homosexual sodomy with up to twenty years in prison. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 9:46 am by Gritsforbreakfast
The law, which doesn't trump stricter community ordinances, mandates up to a $100 fine per offense.Other states also call for fines or even arrest warrants in such cases, including Iowa — where an overdue-book offender was jailed for a week — Vermont and Maine.Of course, the  US Supreme Court ruled in Atwater v. [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 7:47 am by Jeff Gamso
That is so, because adjudication of those claims and the Government’s defenses thereto would require disclosure of national-security information subject to the DNI’s assertion of the state secrets privilege.So said the government (ours) Monday in Jewel v. [read post]
15 Jul 2015, 6:21 am by Howard Friedman
Following the Supreme Court's recent decision legalizing same-sex marriage throughout the United States, many commentators noted that same-sex couples may still face discrimination because sexual orientation discrimination is not explicitly prohibited under federal law nor under the law of a number of states. [read post]
24 Sep 2019, 7:28 pm by David Oscar Markus
Also in Tallahassee, Miami lawyers Tara Kawass and Chris DeCoste have started trial in State v. [read post]