Search for: "United States v. John"
Results 7421 - 7440
of 11,599
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Oct 2012, 1:06 pm
United States, declaring that police use of a heat-sensing device from outside a house was a search that required a warrant. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 9:49 am
United States under Apprendi v. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 8:04 am
John Wiley & Sons, Inc. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 7:16 am
Plumer instead voted for his friend, Secretary of State John Quincy Adams for President and United States Ambassador to Britain, William Rush as Vice-President, even though neither Adams nor Rush were candidates for those offices. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 6:07 am
On February 23, 2012, United States Magistrate Judge John Conroy issued a search warrant for the Residence.U.S. v. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 12:10 am
In other words, the case deals with the fate of all copies that the U.S. copyright owner made, or licensed to be made, and which happened to have been made anywhere other than in the United States. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 9:12 pm
John Wiley & Sons, Inc., a case involving the applicability of U.S. copyright law to copies of works created and legally acquired abroad and subsequently imported into the United States. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 9:12 pm
John Wiley & Sons, Inc., a case involving the applicability of U.S. copyright law to copies of works created and legally acquired abroad and subsequently imported into the United States. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 11:42 am
As you can see, John has a talent that has not been dampened by Sandy, and it also refuses to be completely buried even under the weight of unfortunately necessary sentences like this one: The petition argues that the lower court’s decision conflicts with the “curtilage” rule from United States v. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 8:20 am
John Wiley & Sons, Inc., the Court considered whether copyrighted works made and purchased abroad can be bought and sold within the United States without the copyright owner’s permission. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 7:44 am
United States, 12-5271, for yesterday’s grant in McQuiggin v. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
, says: In the same way that Congress did not intend to cabin section 602’s application to copies from countries with a shorter term or compulsory licenses, the legislative record provides no evidence that it intended its application to situations where a trademark owner adds a copyrightable insignia or label on goods to protect against their parallel importation into the United States. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
On Monday, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Kirtsaeng v John Wiley & Sons, a case dealing with the impact of copyright’s first sale doctrine — 17 USC § 109(a) — on the Copyright Act’s importation prohibition — 17 USC § 602(a)(1). [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 12:22 pm
Millions sold in the United States. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 11:04 am
In more plain English, if someone in the United States purchases legitimate copies of some item abroad that has a copyrighted work somewhere in it, can they import those items into the United States and resell them here without violating the Copyright Act? [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 10:30 am
UNITED STATES In Padilla v. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 8:42 am
It will also hear arguments in a case looking at copyright protections, considering whether they extend to books and other intellectual property made overseas, but sold in the United States. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 5:17 am
Dorr v. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 3:44 am
That’s the issue tackled by the 2nd District in State v. [read post]
28 Oct 2012, 11:56 am
This involves parallel importation of text books into the United States that were legitimately manufactured abroad. [read post]
