Search for: "United States v. Mark" Results 7421 - 7440 of 10,394
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jul 2019, 4:17 am by Edith Roberts
United States, the court should have revived a doctrine that prohibits Congress from delegating its authority to other entities, observing that “[i]t’s not often one has the opportunity to undo an original sin. [read post]
14 Jun 2014, 6:02 am by hectormicrojuris
United States], que establece que si un usuario escribe su información personal en un sitio en la web, el gobierno puede accederla sin autorización del mismo. [read post]
19 May 2011, 8:36 am by David Oscar Markus
United States has all kinds of great rhetoric. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 11:00 am
United Federation of Teachers et al., amici curiae. [read post]
28 May 2008, 2:02 am
The Court can only address those legal issues brought before it by States under its contentious jurisdiction or by United Nations organs or authorized agencies seeking an advisory opinion. [read post]
19 Aug 2022, 6:34 am by Doyle Hodges
§ 332 states, “Whenever the President considers that unlawful obstructions, combinations, or assemblages, or rebellion against the authority of the United States, make it impracticable to enforce the laws of the United States in any State by the ordinary course of judicial proceedings, he may … use such of the armed forces, as he considers necessary to enforce those laws or to suppress the rebellion” (emphasis added). [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 8:33 am by Stephen E. Sachs
All these sources, in Judge Fletcher's excellent formulation, were laws for the United States, if not of the United States. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 2:05 pm by Tony Mauro
The protests marked the two-year anniversary Saturday of the Supreme Court’s 5-4 decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
The plaintiffs emphasize the long history of Virginia mandating disclosure of race as a means of enforcing the state’s anti-miscegenation laws prior to the Supreme Court’s 1967 decision in Loving v. [read post]
15 Sep 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
It is clear that politics in the United States frequently depart from norms of comity and respect. [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 6:34 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: New Zealand Prime Minister announces s 92A ‘three strikes’ copyright provision will be scrapped (Excess Copyright) (Michael Geist) (TorrentFreak) (Ars Technica) (ContentAgenda) (Managing Intellectual Property) (Public Knowledge) (Excess Copyright) (IPKat) US: TomTom files countersuit against Microsoft claiming its Streets… [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 5:12 am
Frontline (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) No extensions allowed – California District Court finds that non-functional use of file extension may be trade marked: Autodesk, Inc. v Dassault Systemes SolidWorks Corp. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 6:02 pm by Duncan
Frontline (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) No extensions allowed – California District Court finds that non-functional use of file extension may be trade marked: Autodesk, Inc. v Dassault Systemes SolidWorks Corp. [read post]