Search for: "Waits v. State" Results 7421 - 7440 of 10,704
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Apr 2020, 10:49 am by Jay Stanley
United States — we argue that tracking individuals in the way that this technology does is something the government cannot do without a warrant. [read post]
18 Sep 2013, 7:28 am
John adds that Mr Brandis has stated that the new Government will wait until the post-implementation review of the ARR scheme is complete before it does anything. [read post]
10 Jan 2023, 7:32 am by Derek T. Muller
Interestingly, there are not any California law schools on the list, a cohort I had assumed might benefit most from the state’s difficult bar examination and perhaps a higher “wait and see” approach from prospective employers.Now, to schools more likely to be adversely affected.SCHOOLS LIKELY TO BE ADVERSELY AFFECTEDAt grad v. 10 monthMassachusetts-Dartmouth 33.9%, 47.5%Yale 89.2%, 89.2%Stanford 88.5%, 89.0%BYU 82.8%, 85.9%Northwestern 87.9%, 89.5%CUNY… [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 5:38 am by Jeff Gamso
United States (which I've written about before) and you can read the opinions here. [read post]
10 May 2023, 6:02 am by Michael C. Dorf
But the administration doesn't have to wait for the outcome of litigation to take action. [read post]
29 May 2014, 7:46 am by Stephen D. Rosenberg
I was thinking of this because Mitchell Shames, who is now an independent fiduciary at Harrison Fiduciary and before that was the long time general counsel for State Street Global Advisors (including during the time that the First Circuit blessed their structure for handling exactly these types of conflicts, in Bunch v. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 5:15 pm
Regardless of the outcome of the case between Capitol Records and ReDigi (Capitol Records, LLC v. [read post]
10 Jan 2023, 7:32 am by Derek T. Muller
Interestingly, there are not any California law schools on the list, a cohort I had assumed might benefit most from the state’s difficult bar examination and perhaps a higher “wait and see” approach from prospective employers.Now, to schools more likely to be adversely affected.SCHOOLS LIKELY TO BE ADVERSELY AFFECTEDAt grad v. 10 monthMassachusetts-Dartmouth 33.9%, 47.5%Yale 89.2%, 89.2%Stanford 88.5%, 89.0%BYU 82.8%, 85.9%Northwestern 87.9%, 89.5%CUNY… [read post]
28 Mar 2014, 3:42 am
A bit of luck for Tubes perhaps - but more of a wait for both parties while the previous round of the litigation is repeated.Regular users of the Cancellation Division and Boards of Appeal will also know that they regularly decline to deal with all the arguments put, even when expressly asked by a party to do so: see Julius Sämann Ltd v Jees SRO, ICD 3630. [read post]
11 Oct 2020, 1:58 pm by Mark Tushnet
The same goes for review of state and local legislation; there you have to talk about the possibility of congressional legislation to preempt bad stuff – freed of the constraint of City of Boerne v. [read post]
11 Dec 2024, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
I say no; Justices Alito and Thomas say yes; because the rest of the Court denied cert, we will need to wait a while to learn the answer given by the other Justices.Part I of my article builds on a substantial body of scholarly work and case law pre-dating Students for Fair Admissions v. [read post]