Search for: "Application of Smith"
Results 7441 - 7460
of 7,623
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jun 2007, 10:16 am
You conclude there's enough time left on the patent, not by a lot but enough, to justify spending the money for those studies.So unlike a lot of manufacturers and a lot of off-label uses, you the drug company undertake the time and expense of a supplemental new drug application for this use. [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 1:16 am
See Smith v. [read post]
27 Jun 2007, 8:42 pm
Smith said he was concerned more state banks would switch to a national charter if the bill were enacted. [read post]
26 Jun 2007, 7:00 am
The applicable provisions:SEC. 8101. [read post]
26 Jun 2007, 2:28 am
Source: New York Legislative Retrieval Service (LRS) June 24, 2007. [read post]
25 Jun 2007, 6:07 am
” Smith v. [read post]
23 Jun 2007, 11:45 am
" Shepherd Smith and Edwards is a securities law firm which represents investors nationwide in claims against investment firms. [read post]
22 Jun 2007, 10:04 am
Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) and Lamar Smith (R-Texas) took a peek, it really went viral. [read post]
21 Jun 2007, 11:10 am
Smith, 714 So. 2d 652, 654 (Fla. [read post]
20 Jun 2007, 1:16 am
Cyril Smith [read post]
19 Jun 2007, 9:07 am
Smith, Jeffery L. [read post]
19 Jun 2007, 4:01 am
Smith, 263 F.3d 571, 586 (6th Cir. 2001). [read post]
19 Jun 2007, 3:21 am
See Smith v. [read post]
18 Jun 2007, 3:16 am
A780
Wright -- Authorizes an application for permission to appeal to the court of appeals from an order concerning a change of venue No Same as Last Act: 06/12/07 reported referred to rulesA4529
Seminerio -- Provides for the crediting of prior service by the fire department pension fund of the city of New York Same as Uni. [read post]
17 Jun 2007, 7:15 am
The declaration was procedurally improper and explicitly ignored by the USPTO, but does raise the issue of whether HER patent applications were obvious in view of the prior art. [read post]
15 Jun 2007, 3:40 pm
The older of the two, Smith v. [read post]
15 Jun 2007, 6:36 am
Finding the Wisconsin statutes unclear, and no applicable case authority, the trial judge relied upon the words of Mick Jagger: "You can't always get what you want. [read post]
14 Jun 2007, 7:19 am
In particular, three of the five decisions in which Kennedy joined the left (Smith, Brewer, and Abdul-Kabir) were essentially fact-bound rebukes of the Texas courts and Fifth Circuit for their application of the Penry II mitigating evidence rule. [read post]
13 Jun 2007, 5:28 pm
In particular, three of the five decisions in which Kennedy joined the left (Smith, Brewer, and Abdul-Kabir) were essentially fact-bound rebukes of the Texas courts and Fifth Circuit for their application of the Penry II mitigating evidence rule. [read post]
13 Jun 2007, 5:28 pm
In particular, three of the five decisions in which Kennedy joined the left (Smith, Brewer, and Abdul-Kabir) were essentially fact-bound rebukes of the Texas courts and Fifth Circuit for their application of the Penry II mitigating evidence rule. [read post]
