Search for: "Arizona Supreme Court"
Results 7441 - 7460
of 9,064
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Nov 2022, 9:18 am
Many Senate and gubernatorial candidates who lashed themselves closely to Trump, like Lake in Arizona and Mastriano in Pennsylvania, lost. [read post]
5 Jul 2024, 3:00 am
From the States and Municipalities Arizona – Appeals Court Upholds Core of AZ ‘Dark Money’ Disclosure Law Voters Approved in 2022 Arizona Mirror – Caitlin Sievers | Published: 6/29/2024 A three-judge panel of the Arizona Court of Appeals upheld most of the Voters’ Right to Know Act, which passed in 2022. [read post]
7 Mar 2022, 9:21 am
” The Supreme Court reversed, holding that “state action immunity” did not apply. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 6:03 am
The Supreme Court has held, in Martin v. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 3:45 am
While the Supreme Court had held in Edwards v. [read post]
22 May 2017, 6:15 am
Writing at Forbes.com, IJ Communications Associate Nick Sibilla delves into a unanimous decision by the Georgia Supreme Court that rejected that “taking” claim and the taxi drivers’ demand for “compensation. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 8:03 pm
Supreme Court in Arizona v. [read post]
1 Apr 2022, 4:00 am
However, it ultimately seems no crazier than the rest of the Supreme Court's recent religious exceptions jurisprudence. [read post]
11 Jun 2007, 1:41 pm
Green for the Norfhwestern University Supreme Court Practicum. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 2:57 pm
This is why Simpson was tried for murder by a California court and not a court in Arizona. [read post]
29 Jun 2014, 9:01 pm
Courts can revisit their prior rulings, higher courts can change the legal landscape against which lower courts make decisions (as the Supreme Court in fact did in the immigration regulation setting in 2012 in Arizona v. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 10:49 am
No other entity or court appears to have applied the Arizona opinion. [read post]
12 Jun 2016, 5:32 pm
On July 13, 2006, the Nevada Supreme Court reversed the lower court’s dismissal, holding that the plaintiffs should have been permitted to amend their pleadings. [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 5:11 pm
A California appellate court mandamused a trial court that allowed a mother to move to Arizona during the pendency of a divorce because the trial court did not consider the child's best interest but only whether the father had proved a change in circumstances. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 12:12 pm
This is in the context, of course, of pending Supreme Court rulings on whether the federal government can override Arizona’s immigration law and whether the government is guilty of overreaching its powers in the passage of the Affordable Care Act with an individual mandate. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 2:29 am
Courts in two other states, Arizona and Vermont, have reached similar conclusions. [read post]
31 May 2009, 3:37 pm
It is about time the Court faced the fact that the white people of the south don't like the colored people; the constitution restrains them from effecting thru (sic) state action but it most assuredly did not appoint the Court as a sociological watchdog to rear up every time private discrimination raises its admittedly ugly head.Rehnquist's argument mirrors the Supreme Court's logic in Plessy and in the Civil Rights Cases (a 19th Century case that… [read post]
17 Jan 2020, 3:00 am
Supreme Court ruled the longstanding prohibition on independent expenditures by corporations violated the First Amendment. [read post]
22 Jul 2022, 11:02 am
That would (assuming other factors that I describe here) mean that the Republican nominee in 2024 could hold everything from 2020 and have Arizona, Georgia, and the Michigan/Pennsylvania/Wisconsin flipper guarantee a win in the Electoral College.I agree with Professor Dorf that the Supreme Court's Radical 5 are likely to gi [read post]
13 Feb 2011, 4:08 am
Supreme Court (Case No. [read post]
