Search for: "California v. Law"
Results 7441 - 7460
of 33,829
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Oct 2019, 9:01 pm
The plaintiffs emphasize the long history of Virginia mandating disclosure of race as a means of enforcing the state’s anti-miscegenation laws prior to the Supreme Court’s 1967 decision in Loving v. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 3:51 pm
California Coastal Commission, et al. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 3:06 pm
*New Case Law The California Court of Appeal recently ruled on the case of Eisen v. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 3:06 pm
In Kent v. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 2:11 pm
LinkedIn Corp., declaring that selectively banning potential competitors from accessing and using public data “may well be considered unfair competition under California law. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 9:33 am
The court held that the data are not investigative records under the California Public Records Act that law enforcement can keep secret. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 5:32 am
The employees cited the California Supreme Court’s landmark 2018 decision in Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 4:03 am
Her words echo the standard refrains that have been deployed to defend affirmative action since Justice Lewis Powell’s opinion in University of California v. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 2:41 am
The company may have succeeded in creating a lasting new way for transporting people around (unless regulatory and legislative pushback, such as the recently enacted law in California requiring the business to treat drivers as employees rather than contractors, here, becomes widespread), but the long-term effect may be to turn it into a commodity, where familiarity with local market conditions and price competition, not brand strength, are paramount. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 12:33 pm
See Barnhill v. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 12:12 pm
If applicable law is clear and unambiguous, the court must assess whether the FCC complied with the legislative mandate. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 12:12 pm
If applicable law is clear and unambiguous, the court must assess whether the FCC complied with the legislative mandate. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 10:21 am
Ramos v. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 6:54 am
The court’s dissenters might have had the same concern in mind last May when Justice Stephen Breyer concluded his dissenting opinion in Franchise Tax Board of California v. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 7:09 pm
That portion of the order, if upheld, could have undermined California’s recently passed net neutrality law. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 4:32 pm
Thornton and Cook v. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 3:46 pm
Hansen Knick v. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 3:17 pm
In Mozilla Corp. v. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 3:17 pm
In Mozilla Corp. v. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 1:25 pm
Under the McGill Rule, an arbitration agreement that precludes a consumer from pursuing claims for “public” injunctive relief in court or in arbitration is unenforceable under California law. [read post]
