Search for: "Child v. Child"
Results 7441 - 7460
of 31,295
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Apr 2021, 3:19 pm
Sources: https://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/statutes/statutes/767/v/471 Read More [read post]
15 Sep 2018, 6:30 pm
In an important decision, a Michigan federal district court in Dumont v. [read post]
26 Sep 2014, 4:32 am
Apparently, the Court of Appeals agreed, finding in Kubicki v Sharpe that the dispute hinged on precisely when Mother's "active duty" commenced. [read post]
13 Nov 2019, 7:37 am
Evidence of a “clear and long history of spousal abuse” may suffice to show a propensity for child abuse, see Walsh v. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 5:10 pm
We care if a parent has a seizure disorder when we assess what the best interests of a child are in a custody case. [read post]
8 Jul 2022, 5:29 am
Argued April 27, 2022—Decided June 29, 2022 Castro-Huerta was convicted of child neglect in Oklahoma state court. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 7:53 pm
May 4, 2016 Judge Spina commented that in the Guardianship of V.V. 470 Mass 590 (2015) the court ruled that a parent who has a minor child subject to a guardianship proceeding pursuant to G.L. c. 190B. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 8:37 am
Pinto v. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 1:55 pm
Beck v. [read post]
29 Aug 2017, 8:56 am
The Court noted that IDEA does not guarantee that a child make any progress. [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 8:12 am
See also, United States v. [read post]
28 Sep 2014, 12:51 pm
That is essentially the question raised in the Huss v. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 7:42 am
In Johnson v. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 6:41 am
In the unreported ( non-precedential) case of Galdo v. [read post]
1 May 2012, 2:28 pm
Stellmach v. [read post]
23 Dec 2006, 8:49 am
Sheehan v. [read post]
13 Feb 2018, 5:45 am
Rodriguez v. [read post]
1 Feb 2018, 1:39 pm
(Indian Child Welfare Act - Tribal Intervention)In Interest of J.L. and S.M. [read post]
1 Feb 2018, 1:39 pm
(Indian Child Welfare Act - Tribal Intervention)In Interest of J.L. and S.M. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 4:00 am
The Child Poverty Action Group (Respondent) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions(Appellant) [2010] UKSC 54 – Read judgment / press release The Supreme Court has ruled that where benefits are overpaid as a result of a mistaken calculation, the department responsible cannot claim these amounts back via the common law route of restitution; the Secretary of State’s only recourse is via Section 71 of the Social Security Administration Act. [read post]
