Search for: "Companies A, B, and C"
Results 7441 - 7460
of 12,894
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jul 2013, 1:22 pm
Payne There is no doubt that the government has the right, and even the responsibility, to terminate a contract completely or partially for default “if the contractor fails to (a) make delivery of the supplies or perform the services within the time specified in the contract, (b) perform any other provision of the contract, or (c) make progress and that failure endangers performance of the contract. [read post]
25 Jul 2013, 9:30 am
Ohio June 5, 2013) When Plaintiff's employment ended and she returned her company-issued Blackberry, she believed that she had deleted her personal email account. [read post]
25 Jul 2013, 6:23 am
Declining to adopt a de minimis exception; b.) [read post]
25 Jul 2013, 6:21 am
Action Ink sent a C&D, to which A-B responded that it would neither C nor D since it wasn’t infringing. [read post]
23 Jul 2013, 7:19 am
Categories of persons who have standing to sure under the statute include: a) insured b) named beneficiaries c) intended third party beneficiaries d) agents e) claimants who relied on representations by the insurer. [read post]
23 Jul 2013, 1:00 am
The said instrument contained the following declarations:in accordance with Article 5(2)(d) of the Madrid Protocol (1989), under Article 5(2)(b) of the Protocol, the time limit of one year to exercise the right to notify a refusal of protection referred to in Article 5(2)(a) thereof is replaced by 18 months and under Article 5(2)(c) of the said Protocol, when a refusal of protection may result from an opposition to the granting of protection, such refusal may be notified to… [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 3:02 pm
(UPS) demoted Michael Battaglia shortly after he objected that his supervisor, Wayne DeCraine, called female employees "c*nts," referred to a particular woman as "that b*tch," called another female employee "big t*ts," expressed his desire to have sex with another female employee, referred to an employee named Regina as "Vagina," and discussed pornographic websites he visited at home. [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 11:56 am
Between $125 for the training plus a few recent research and travel expenses, Grits' blog coffers are running low.)TDCAA's Shannon Edmonds put up a telling slide depicting the number of new crimes created by the Legislature each session (excluding mere penalty "enhancements," or increased penalties for existing crimes):2001: 342003: 232005: 492007: 502009: 402011: 532013: 41New crimes this year include "Uprooting seagrass plants" (Class C misdemeanor) and "performing device maintenance… [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 11:16 am
” From Timothy B. [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 7:55 am
Individuals and companies with potential liability under these securities laws may thus rest assured that after a specific date, no claims may be brought. [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 4:29 am
Specsavers had more luck in the Court of Appeal though: it held the company entitled to prevent Asda from using the slogans ‘Be a real spec saver at Asda’ and ‘Spec savings at Asda’ as well as the logo used by Asda in its advertising campaign. [read post]
19 Jul 2013, 5:12 pm
Lyle B. [read post]
19 Jul 2013, 5:00 am
by Dan Rosen Simply put, the proposed SEC ruling is (a) trying to fix a problem that doesn’t exist; (b) will increase risk in our early-stage deals by adding a dimension of regulatory risk that isn’t there now; (c) will increase the cost and time for getting deals done; and (d) violates the Congressional intent of the JOBS Act, which recognized that using angel investment to create more jobs in startup companies was good for the US. [read post]
19 Jul 2013, 2:00 am
b. [read post]
17 Jul 2013, 8:32 am
§§ 1114, 1116, 1117, 1125(a) and (c); trademark infringement and unfair competition under the common law of the State of Indiana; and forgery under Indiana Code § 35- 43-5-2(b) as well as counterfeiting under Indiana Code § 35-43-5-2(a), pursuant to Indiana Code § 34-24-3-1. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 5:05 pm
At the time they were proposed, both I and others had some concerns about the regulations and the impact they would have on small companies raising funds (see this post regarding my views and this post on the Angel Capital Association’s views). [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 9:59 am
§ 1201(b)(2)(C). [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 10:05 pm
§ 1201(b)(2)(C). [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 5:42 pm
The court concluded that 30 U.S.C. 932(l), as amended by section 1556(b) of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, Pub. [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 4:27 am
Sky had made out its case of infringement under the Trade Marks Act 1994 section 10(2)(b) and Regulation 40/94 [now Regulation 207/2009] article 9(1)(b) [ie (i) identical or similar services, (ii) similar marks and (iii) likelihood of confusion, including a likelihood of association]. [read post]
