Search for: "DOE DEFENDANT"
Results 7441 - 7460
of 112,789
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Apr 2009, 7:05 pm
Black defendants appear to fare worse than similarly situated white defendants. [read post]
22 Sep 2015, 5:41 am
The defendants filed a motion to stay discovery until the district court ruled upon its motion to dismiss pursuant to 35 U.S.C. [read post]
26 Apr 2007, 12:27 pm
As explained below, an injunction issued following a trial that determined that the defendant defamed the plaintiff that does no more than prohibit the defendant from repeating the defamation, is not a prior restraint and does not offend the First Amendment.Later, the majority opinion explains, "The United States Supreme Court has never addressed the precise question before us -- whether an injunction prohibiting the repetition of statements found at trial to… [read post]
13 Sep 2008, 12:51 am
The Court further affirmed that the City’s affordable housing ordinance is not a housing element, does not amend the City’s housing element and thus does not require review by the DHCD. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 5:22 am
Court did not make sufficient findings and record does not establish that imprisonment in prison rather than county jail would better deter the defendant from continued unlicensed driving. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 9:43 am
” Randolph does not stand for the proposition that the defendant cannot be removed from the premises to defeat consent. [read post]
1 Jul 2016, 2:58 am
Does 1-29, No. 16 C 4016, Slip Op. [read post]
24 Oct 2012, 7:48 am
Defendant now moves to suppress the tablets as evidence. [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 12:24 pm
Unlike the defendant in Strickler, Appellee herein had been subjected to a traffic stop. [read post]
21 May 2016, 12:44 pm
Here are the highlights of the new law: What does DTSA do? [read post]
21 Sep 2016, 5:37 am
A criminal defendant does not have an absolute right to be present at all points in a trial. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 3:00 am
Yaron Shaham The post How Does the “Resident” Versus “Citizen” Distinction Observed in Other Parts of 28 U.S.C. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 10:20 am
Evan Brown reports, as he does so often, about an important ruling that deals another blow to attempts at using intellectual property, and particularly its growing penumbras in the secondary liability area, law as a magic legal elixir to fix ever perceived legal or commercial problem: After defendant left plaintiff’s employment to co-found a competing company, plaintiff sued defendant personally for copyright infringement based on the new company’s… [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 8:56 am
In this type of case, does the private party’s search of the defendant’s computer destroy the defendant’s privacy interest such that an officer may then search the computer without a search warrant? [read post]
2 Apr 2010, 5:30 am
But clever lawyers for both plaintiffs and defendants have capitalized on a far simpler ambiguity in the statute. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 6:07 am
Defendant had no standing in a hidden compartment in a vessel which was not his sleeping compartment. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 9:38 am
Dragovic does not reliably apply those principles to the facts of this case. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 10:00 am
The District Attorney does not have to put on all his evidence at the Preliminary Hearing so the judge will normally ignore the fact that the standard has been barely met. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 4:01 pm
Actual knowledge refers to the defendant’s true knowledge of a hazard. [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 11:25 am
By holding that the setoff does not control essentially eliminate the pleading distinctions between affirmative defenses and counterclaims. [read post]
