Search for: "Doe Defendants 1 to 20"
Results 7441 - 7460
of 8,963
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jul 2010, 9:48 pm
(General Security),1 and the broadening scope of insurance policy "loss in progress" and "known loss" provisions, House Bill (H.B.) 10-1394, codified at CRS §§ 10-4-110.4 and 13-20-808: (1) provides courts guidance when interpreting liability policies issued to construction professionals; (2) deems property damage resulting from construction defects, including damage to a construction professional’s own work, an "accident,"… [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 5:00 am
Id. at *20. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 4:33 am
Although the legislation does not specifically mention parallel imports, domestic trademark proprietors may try to rely on Article 50(a) of the Regulations and Article 52(1) of the Trademark Law for protection. [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 2:33 am
It’s been a real pleasure. [1] The first was Deference in Name Only: Judicial Review of Ontario’s Information and Privacy Commissioner, (1998) 20 Adv. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 8:57 pm
July 20, 2010). [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 7:18 am
The court’s ruling does not comport with the law. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 5:28 am
LEXIS 1326 (July 20, 2010).* Defendant’s claim that defense counsel was ineffective for not arguing that the search warrant specify the crime under investigation fails. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 3:10 am
Thus, going forward with the appeal does not seem like a worthwhile gamble for Flexiteek. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 3:10 am
Thus, going forward with the appeal does not seem like a worthwhile gamble for Flexiteek. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 12:39 am
Etymotic Research, Inc (Docket Report) District Court N D California: Location of manufacture and decision to mark weight heavily on venue analysis for false marking claims; action dismissed where another qui tam realtor had filed an earlier suit against defendant: San Francisco Technology, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Jul 2010, 11:20 am
How does that differ? [read post]
24 Jul 2010, 8:59 am
Defendant’s traffic ticket took 17-20 minutes. [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 5:32 am
It began by noting that under the plain error rule, the party asserting error “`must establish (1) that there was in fact an error; (2) that the error was plain; and (3) that the error’” affected the defendant’s substantial rights. [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 8:15 pm
John Deere Co., 383 U.S. 1, 17-18 (1966). [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 4:29 pm
” At least two older boys sat on the couch nearby as Lisa exited and entered the room a few times over a period of approximately 20–30 minutes and attended other children. [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 2:02 pm
July 20, 2010)Favors: EmployeeLaw: North Carolina [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 5:33 am
Defendant had no reasonable expectation of privacy in placement of a GPS on the exterior of his SUV, so Rule 41(b)(4) does not apply, even if it could because state officers put it there in a state investigation. [read post]
What's so bad about "business method" patents? Small PR firms "goosed" by a patent on press releases
21 Jul 2010, 5:52 pm
One defendant targeted by Gooseberry who spoke with The Prior Art, eReleases owner Mickie Kennedy, reacted as many small companies do when hit with such a lawsuit—surprise that a patent claiming to cover what his business does could even exist. [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 8:42 am
The issue of whether this was a search does not have to be decided. [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 6:24 am
Defendant’s continued stop was based on reasonable suspicion, and a wait of up to 20 minutes for a drug dog to arrive was not unreasonable. [read post]
