Search for: "Does, A-H" Results 7441 - 7460 of 16,615
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jun 2018, 8:24 am
And what does work on interactions between the legal and literary imagination in other periods or cultures put in perspective for anglophone early modernists? [read post]
27 Nov 2015, 8:00 am by Dan Ernst
“Confronting the Violence(s) of History” leads to questions such as:How does thinking about the points of intersection between violence and resistance question our normative understandings of these categories? [read post]
9 Oct 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
” And “[h]istory, not policy, is the proper guide. [read post]
26 Dec 2023, 2:34 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
Nor, for that matter, does a defendant have an adequate opportunity to assert constitutional violations in the state proceeding when the prosecution itself is the constitutional violation. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 12:55 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
It does no credit to the arguments of the parties to impugn the motives or the competence of the members of this court; ad hominem attacks are not a substitute for effective advocacy. [read post]
19 Apr 2021, 3:19 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
For our purposes, and for purposes of applying the Confrontation Clause generally, it does not matter which testimony was true. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 8:39 am by Gregory J. Brod
  Section (h) of the Act specifically prohibits an employer from retaliating against an employee for any efforts, including the filing of a qui tam claim, to stop any actions in violation of the FCA. [read post]
6 Nov 2007, 7:19 am
Schumer has an op-ed in The New York Times this morning explaining his decision to vote in favor of the nomination (H/T: Marty Lederman). [read post]
29 May 2015, 4:00 am by Tim Sitzmann
For example, even if TOMMY HILFIGER is a famous mark, this does not mean that the TH logo is a famous mark (H/T TTAB). [read post]
5 Mar 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  As she explains, this initial step, which is relatively unproblematic in civil cases where the expected recovery does (or does not) make the contingent fee adequate to incentivize lawyers, is very challenging in the Section 1983 context. [read post]