Search for: "Does 1-27"
Results 7441 - 7460
of 12,453
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Feb 2014, 8:16 am
2) Does substantial evidence support those findings? [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 7:48 am
David did not file the Petition until December 27, 2013. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 3:19 pm
It does not matter what they thought. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 8:00 am
(Id. at 27.) [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 11:42 am
That same day, the Clerk distributed the briefs to the Justices for their case conference on January 24.Monday, January 27, came and went with no word of the Supreme Court's decision. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 10:30 am
Yet what has entirely escaped comment are some more interesting findings that can be gleaned only from crunching the numbers. 1. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 9:33 am
Doe and Doe v. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 9:33 am
Doe and Doe v. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 9:33 am
Doe and Doe v. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 4:08 am
4% of U.S. respondents and 5% of global respondents reported financial losses of $1 million or more through bribery and corruption. 28% of U.S. organizations and 27% of global organizations reported financial losses of $50,000 to $1 million. [read post]
23 Feb 2014, 12:00 am
Ultimately, even if direct-to-consumer genetic testing is snake oil, what does that matter? [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 8:49 pm
Deference would not ameliorate those causes of uncertainty; it would make them worse.Lighting Ballast Control, LLC at *27.In the brief filed by Ci [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 8:53 am
” In re Fosamax Products Liability Litigation, 2013 WL 174416, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 9:12 pm
Topics to be addressed could include, but are not limited to, the following: 1. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 6:53 am
Intent to useSecondly, FirstRand sought revocation on the basis of section 27(1)(a), which provides for revocation where the mark was registered without any bona fide intention that it would be used and no use has in fact been made of the mark. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 8:31 pm
The characteristicof this system is that the opinion of the judiciary [1], while binding, is binding onlyif it is contrary to extradition.It establishes the sources:• Treaties. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 12:38 pm
Sure it does. [read post]
15 Feb 2014, 8:19 am
Sattler Supply Co., 13-2558 (La. 1/27/14), the employee died after a large engine block he was cleaning fell on him. [read post]
15 Feb 2014, 3:31 am
The case was decided in favour of the defendants by a Swedish court in 2010, and it was later appealed and the second court referred it to the CJEU with the following questions: “(1) If anyone other than the holder of copyright in a certain work supplies a clickable link to the work on his website, does that constitute communication to the public within the meaning of Article 3(1) of Directive [2001/29]? [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 5:00 am
Answer #1 It depends. [read post]
