Search for: "Fine v. Fine"
Results 7441 - 7460
of 16,013
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jul 2015, 2:22 am
In a 2008 decision, the Paris Court of Appeal drew a very fine line between protectable and non-protectable photographs taken during the same shooting session (Paris, 20 février 2008, n° 06/22330, SARL Les archives to 7eme Art c/ Stéphane Mirkine : Propr, Intell. 2008, p. 319 note Lucas (photographie de plateau)). [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 9:04 pm
That, in fact, is the very heart of what the Court did last year in its one fully considered ruling in this series — the decision in Burwell v. [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 4:05 am
In M.B. v. [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 10:48 pm
Bode v. [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 2:12 pm
Angel Diaz In City of Los Angeles v. [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 8:52 am
The court imposed a $2,000 fine on each of the four attempted child pornography convictions and a $1,000 fine on each of the three child pornography convictions. [read post]
12 Jul 2015, 8:15 pm
A private detective has only the right of a private person with respect to arrest, Dohery v. [read post]
12 Jul 2015, 4:47 am
Readers of the IPKat blog may remember that Lindsay Lohan tried last year to convince a New York court that a video game had infringed her rights to publicity when depicting a blonde woman making the “V” sign, as Ms. [read post]
11 Jul 2015, 2:14 pm
While the settlement payment required by the resolution agreement is relatively small compared to much more significant fines imposed under other past OCR resolution agreements, the Resolution Agreement merits the immediate attention of all Covered Entities and their business associates because its focus on HIPAA obligations impacting internet application and data use and sharing activities engaged in by virtually every Covered Entity and business associate. [read post]
9 Jul 2015, 9:53 am
That’s fine to a point—this isn’t Hogwarts, and a sentence is not a magic spell. [read post]
[Nicholas Quinn Rosenkranz] Los Angeles v. Patel and the constitutional structure of judicial review
9 Jul 2015, 5:17 am
This is fine as far as it goes. [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 8:37 pm
Therefore although it is very busy I'm fine. [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 6:03 pm
” Vieth v. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 9:30 pm
In another case, DOT v. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 4:39 am
Church & Dwight Co. v. [read post]
5 Jul 2015, 11:45 am
This is true even though prison penalties, fines and civil damages are hefty. [read post]
4 Jul 2015, 3:43 am
La Orden General de la Policía de Puerto Rico 2010-6, NORMAS Y PROCEDIMIENTOS PARA EFECTUAR BLOQUEOS DE CARRETERAS establece a tenor con lo dictaminado por nuestro Tribunal Supremo en Pueblo v. [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 6:20 am
Apparently, County of Riverside v. [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 4:28 am
Penalties range from fines of 7,000-11,000 euro to the seizure and destruction of counterfeit goods, equipment and materials used for their production. [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 2:55 am
“In my view, the Court’s decision in FCC v. [read post]
