Search for: "Held v. State" Results 7441 - 7460 of 82,195
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Mar 2008, 12:22 am
Mar. 20, 2008):While § 1981 does not expressly afford a cause of action to private parties, the Supreme Court held in Runyon v. [read post]
9 Aug 2024, 8:55 am by Lawrence Solum
New York held that courts should defer to state legislatures seeking to punish the mere advocacy of revolution. [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 11:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
This proposal raises a potential conflict with Article V, Section 1 of the State Constitution, which grants the Comptroller the power to determine accounting methods, and is troubling with respect to transparency and accuracy in financial reporting. [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 11:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
This proposal raises a potential conflict with Article V, Section 1 of the State Constitution, which grants the Comptroller the power to determine accounting methods, and is troubling with respect to transparency and accuracy in financial reporting. [read post]
12 Apr 2023, 12:10 pm
So if you think (as the voters do here) that it should be a violation of the Constitution for a state to only allow registered members of a party to vote in that party's primary, then by all means, feel free to make that argument.But the Supreme Court held back in 1990 that it was unconstitutional for states (like California) to require an open primary when that's not what the party wants. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 4:43 pm by Eugene Volokh
(Eugene Volokh) So held a North Carolina trial court in Johnston v. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 8:08 am by Allison Trzop
Perry, in which the Court held that the sponsors of California’s ban on same-sex marriage lacked standing to defend the initiative on appeal, and United States v. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 1:02 pm by WIMS
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Central District of California. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 4:15 am by Edith Roberts
The court held 6-3 in Virginia Uranium, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 5:09 am by Amy Howe
Driehaus, in which the Court held that a group which has been accused of violating a state law prohibiting false statements during a political campaign and that is at risk of being accused again can challenge the constitutionality of that law in court, and Abramski v. [read post]