Search for: "In Re Member of Bar" Results 7441 - 7460 of 9,029
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Feb 2010, 5:09 am by Dr. Jillian T. Weiss
Consequently, the court barred the EEOC from seeking relief on behalf of the 67 allegedly aggrieved persons. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 3:50 am
Friday's the day to check the IPKat's side bar for evidence of exciting new events. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 2:12 pm by Steven G. Pearl
In Deleon, the Court of Appeal originally held that where the plaintiff in a class action pleads the same set of operative facts violating the same primary rights as were raised in a prior class action against the same defendant -- that employer made unlawful chargebacks against employees’ commissions -- even though parties sought different forms of relief, the primary right invaded was identical, and the latter class action was barred by res judicata to the extent that the… [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 10:54 am by KC Johnson
The committee members that nominally supervise the site consist of Nifong’s closest followers, and have admitted that they’re in contact with Nifong himself. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 6:52 am by Bridget Crawford
Does this mean that women are more likely to abuse each other behind bars than men, or that they’re more willing to admit abuse? [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 11:44 am by Amy Wright
Normally, I'm not a big reader of California Lawyer, the monthly magazine that you receive when you're a member of the California bar. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 11:44 am by Amy Wright
Normally, I'm not a big reader of California Lawyer, the monthly magazine that you receive when you're a member of the California bar. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 9:51 am by Erin Miller
  On its face, the original lawsuit in Powell involves an incumbent’s attempt to serve in a Congressional office for which he was duly (re)elected but never sworn in. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 5:29 am by Susan Brenner
Thompson, supra (quoting In re F.P., 878 A.2d 91 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania 2005). [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 10:41 pm by Paul Karlsgodt
  In my view, this should be the primary goal, not forcing class members to benefit from a settlement or forcing a defendant to pay whether or not class members benefit. [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 11:21 am by Steve Hall
Second, we must raise awareness about what we’re up against. [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 1:43 am by Darrin Mish
He is a member of the American Society of IRS Problem Solvers and the Tax Freedom Institute. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 2:39 pm by aallwash
Readers of the Blawg know that ensuring access to electronic legal information is one of AALL’s top policy priorities, and we’re counting on you to help make this state initiative a success. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 12:05 pm by Jimmy Verner
 State Bar of Texas Section Report - Family Law - Summer 2009 by Jimmy L. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 7:39 am
But now we're in a time when leaving may not be so voluntary.I learn about lawyers leaving law firms in two ways - I'm told by the lawyer, or I read about it in the paper. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 5:00 am by Jeffrey M. Reiff
Attorneys specializing in accident cases tell me that their fellow members of the bar tend to be careful drivers. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 3:35 am
Denver Mattress Co., LLC (not precedential) (TTABlog) 9th Circuit: Judicial estoppel does not bar trade dress theory: Larin Corp. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 3:35 am
Denver Mattress Co., LLC (not precedential) (TTABlog) 9th Circuit: Judicial estoppel does not bar trade dress theory: Larin Corp. v. [read post]
21 Feb 2010, 6:51 pm by cdw
”  Majority holds issue is procedurally barred by counsel’s failure to raise it on direct appeal. [read post]