Search for: "In Re Power"
Results 7441 - 7460
of 43,407
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Dec 2008, 5:59 pm
Krent, Conditioning the President's Conditional Pardon Power, 89 Cal. [read post]
15 Mar 2008, 11:33 am
You're hurting me" as country music blared in the background. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 8:50 am
Congress could have re-passed parts of the affected statutes, but this would not necessarily cure the constitutional defects in the Court's eyes. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 3:00 am
See In re OxyContin II, 23 Misc. 3d 974, 881 N.Y.S.2d 812 (Sup. [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 6:48 am
They’re not as progressive as the media makes them out to be. [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 4:17 pm
The issuing of replacement guidance would not therefore appear liable to re-trigger these special procedures. [read post]
21 May 2010, 11:24 am
Whether or not courts could rectify this system, I believe that Congress was well within its Section 5 powers under the Fourteenth Amendment to compensate for the deeply entrenched lack of equal protection by desegregating all public accommodations. [read post]
2 Sep 2022, 12:30 am
Re St. [read post]
13 Feb 2011, 7:42 pm
Of course, they also express absolute confidence in Hosni Mubarak's continued hold on power in Egypt. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 6:36 am
The article linked above is a great guide to all of the procedural arcania involved, so be sure to read the whole thing if you're interested in all the different ways that this could play out next year. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 3:53 pm
Lawyers.com is powered by LexisNexis, a worldwide leader in legal and business information. [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 9:01 pm
You’re the one who is going to live in it. [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 12:07 pm
Welcome to Part 2 of our Ask The Experts article on long-term career planning, partnership prospects, and in-house careers, brought to you by the ATL Career Center, powered by Lateral Link. [read post]
4 May 2006, 10:35 am
He routinely dines with presidents and powerful international businessmen. [read post]
5 Nov 2008, 9:23 am
If they're your statewide candidates with the best chance of winning, why the hell not? [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 12:54 pm
There are huge opportunity costs and unintended consequences inherent in a single-issue advocacy organization having the political power that MADD has. [read post]
24 Oct 2023, 7:41 am
Who do you think they’re going to vote for? [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 10:00 am
The court takes this amendment power to its logical conclusion. [read post]
8 Mar 2017, 7:45 am
On the contrary, we’re prepared to do everything in our power to fight back on behalf of all women — relentlessly. [read post]
30 Oct 2014, 7:57 am
You're a racist. [read post]
