Search for: "John Doe - 1"
Results 7441 - 7460
of 14,620
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jul 2018, 7:12 am
Pujara 6 John E. [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 12:56 pm
Ioannidis “Why Most Published Research Findings Are False,” 1 PLoS Med 8 (2005). [3] Joseph P. [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 9:01 pm
John Doe No. 3, 775 A.2d 756 (N.J. [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 11:01 pm
John Doe No. 3, 775 A.2d 756 (N.J. [read post]
27 May 2008, 10:06 am
Stephens County, No. 07-10729 In a 42 U.S.C. section 1983 action for allegedly causing or failing to prevent the jailhouse death of plaintiff's son, summary judgment for defendant is affirmed where: 1) denial of leave to amend the complaint to name five of the "John Doe" defendants was proper since the statute of limitations rendered amendment futile; and 2) there was insufficient evidence for a reasonable jury to conclude that sheriff personally caused the… [read post]
2 Dec 2012, 9:01 pm
John’s School for the Deaf in St. [read post]
16 Feb 2014, 9:34 am
A: On July 13, 1836, US Patent Number 1 was issued to John Ruggles for traction wheels. [read post]
31 Oct 2015, 12:25 am
Sir John Knight, 90 Eng. [read post]
30 Jan 2014, 12:00 am
If the beauty has withdrawn, it does not vanish. [read post]
18 Apr 2013, 9:01 pm
The report, however, does not find that these unnamed persons had legal responsibility. [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 10:58 am
Apr. 1, 2024). [read post]
19 May 2024, 4:01 am
A breach of s. 530(3) is an error of law warranting appellate intervention under s. 686(1)(a). [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 11:02 pm
I'll leave the more detailed analysis of 1 and 2 to John Harrison, whose work on these questions is superb (see here and here and here). [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 7:38 pm
Johns and Melva Enos (forthcoming) Petitioner’s reply Hardy v. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 6:25 am
Ohio Revised Code § 2317.02(B)(1)(d) says that the physician-patient privilege “does not apply” in any criminal action against a physician or dentist. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 6:12 am
(I’ve blogged about some of these points before.) 1 A jurisprudence of “wrong the day it was decided. [read post]
28 Aug 2006, 10:29 am
The Board adopted, with modifications, the administrative law judge's findings that the Respondent violated Section 8(a)(1) by interrogating employee Tommy Dearing about his union affiliation and that of other employees; violated Section 8(a)(3) by discharging Dering and employees John Smith, Jay Greenwell, and Kenneth Walgreen for refusing to remove union stickers from the hardhats they wore; and violated Section 8(a)(3) and (1) by manipulating and disregarding its… [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 9:01 pm
Hence, the argument goes, a finding of federal preemption does not alter the federal/state balance. [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 12:23 pm
Madison,[1]5 U.S. (1 Cranch) 137 (1803)· Cooper v. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 2:03 pm
But whatever the court does, it is likely to act quickly, to give the state enough time to prepare for the 2024 elections. [read post]
