Search for: "Powers v. Powers"
Results 7441 - 7460
of 55,734
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jun 2016, 12:34 pm
The post State v. [read post]
15 Jun 2016, 12:34 pm
The post State v. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 10:04 am
Interflora British Unit v Marks and Spencer PLC Flowers Direct Online Limited [2009] EWHC 1095 (Ch). [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 8:49 am
And the power to enforce the law exists separate and apart from the power of visitation. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 8:14 am
In its 1968 decision in Zschernig v. [read post]
30 Sep 2014, 10:58 am
EFF intervened in Equustek Solutions v. [read post]
24 Jun 2018, 9:40 am
They refer to some of the usual suspects in the history of corporate law (Berle & Means; Dodge v. [read post]
19 Jul 2018, 7:19 am
For support, McDonnell cited a May decision from the Central District of California, CFTC v. [read post]
15 Mar 2023, 4:05 am
In Ciraci v. [read post]
20 May 2013, 9:33 am
True, Learned Hand had his moment, too, in 1917 with his district court opinion in Masses Publishing Co. v. [read post]
28 Feb 2015, 4:26 am
Australia’s competition watchdog has failed to convince a Federal Court judge that a strategy employed by pharmaceutical company Pfizer, to enter the market for generic products upon expiry of its patent covering blockbuster cholesterol-lowering drug LIPITOR, constituted an illegal misuse of market power, or ‘exclusive dealing’: Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Pfizer Australia Pty Ltd [2015] FCA 113.From the year 2000, when it acquired Warner… [read post]
16 Apr 2015, 3:55 pm
However, in the 1954 case Berman v. [read post]
10 Jan 2023, 6:50 am
"From "Cement-truck drivers went on strike/A lawsuit by their company may pave the way for restricting workers’ rights," the SCOTUSblog write-up of Glacier Northwest v. [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 11:43 am
Here is the abstract:In Heart of Atlanta Motel v. [read post]
23 Aug 2022, 6:00 am
The Court ruled that "if the civil service commissioners have power to certify to the appointing officer only one applicant of several who are eligible and whom they have, by their own methods, ascertained to be fitted for a particular position, and their decision is final ... then the civil service commission becomes and is the actual appointing power" [People v Mosher, 163 NY 32].This decision prompted establishment of the so-called "rule of three,"… [read post]
23 Aug 2022, 6:00 am
The Court ruled that "if the civil service commissioners have power to certify to the appointing officer only one applicant of several who are eligible and whom they have, by their own methods, ascertained to be fitted for a particular position, and their decision is final ... then the civil service commission becomes and is the actual appointing power" [People v Mosher, 163 NY 32].This decision prompted establishment of the so-called "rule of three,"… [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 9:00 am
Moreover, well before Marbury v. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 8:00 am
In Carter v. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 6:59 am
In later installments, I have discussed the seminal decision of TK & SK ex rel LK v. [read post]
26 Jan 2017, 3:49 pm
Pizarro v. [read post]
