Search for: "S. W. v. State"
Results 7441 - 7460
of 14,906
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jun 2012, 4:52 am
In a 5-4 ruling, the Supreme Court has held the individual mandate provision of the Affordable Care Act to be constitutional (National Federation of Independent Business v Sebelius, June 28, 2012, Roberts, J). [read post]
17 Aug 2015, 12:57 pm
Judge Gale's decision earlier this month in Corwin v. [read post]
23 May 2022, 1:00 pm
Co. v. [read post]
4 Feb 2008, 8:40 pm
Again, my original outline is derived from two main sources: lecture notes from a Fall 2006 IP class, taught by Professor Michael W. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 11:17 am
Kivett, and the New York state law in Cantero v. [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 10:44 am
De Simone v. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 6:50 am
[W]hether it’s an interpretative rule or a substantive rule, … you want us to give the same deference to both. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 1:44 pm
Ranch at the Falls LLC v. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 7:46 am
Supreme Court offered in a majority opinion just a few months ago in United States v. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 1:23 pm
[T]he United States [FDA] requires the tablet manufacturers . . . to account for and warn of a drug’s properties. [read post]
20 Dec 2016, 7:51 am
Similarly, in United States v. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 12:28 am
’s trademark. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 3:00 am
Texas v. [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 6:19 am
This is because the statute specifically states the telephone must be used in a manner that allows for `hands-free listening and talking. [read post]
17 Jun 2023, 2:14 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 11:17 am
Here, though, is what the majority said in Hill v. [read post]
6 Aug 2008, 3:44 pm
President George W. [read post]
12 Mar 2009, 9:18 am
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. [read post]
6 Oct 2023, 9:41 am
" It forcefully argues that New York's law compels platforms to adopt the state's preferred definition of what is "hateful" and to refer to it whether they would like to or not. [read post]
