Search for: "Short v. United States" Results 7441 - 7460 of 10,141
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Mar 2022, 9:04 am by Eugene Volokh
From Justice Thomas's statement respecting denial of certiorari today in Doe v. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 7:05 am by Ronald Collins
United States (2000), Rehnquist declined to expressly overrule Miranda v. [read post]
9 Jun 2012, 5:13 am by Russell Beck
” California: On May 14, 2012, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California issued a lengthy decision (Vance’s Foods, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Mar 2009, 1:39 pm
Reasons for judgement were released today (Tong v. [read post]
24 May 2022, 6:07 am by David Pocklington
“Just a Minute” in the Lords: Short debate on assisted dying in the Lords on 6 June, (12 March 2017). [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 10:09 am by Betsy McKenzie
And the recent Supreme Court decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 10:50 am by Francesca Procaccini
” In the second half of his decision, Orenstein distinguishes the principle case the government appears to consistently rely on when requesting these types of orders: United States v. [read post]
29 Nov 2013, 5:10 am
 The IPFinance weblog carries a short note on the launch of the WIPO GREEN database in which the author writes: "This blogger wonders how long it will be before the issues faced by the ICT sector with regard to standard-setting and FRAND licences are endemic in the green technology sector too. [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 4:48 pm
Your Curmudgeon has just received reliable word that ECUSA and its attorneys intend to ask the United States Supreme Court to review the (interlocutory!) [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 5:00 pm by Richard Goldfarb
  The Washington Supreme Court's decision in Bylsma v. [read post]
20 May 2013, 7:37 am by Larry
United States has a few interesting bits of legal analysis in it.The underlying facts of the case are simple enough. [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 9:37 am by Rick St. Hilaire
The Government’s interpretation of [Egyptian patrimony] Law No. 215 and its application to the present case is inaccurate and, worse, absolutely counter to established United States case law. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 2:45 am by Jon L. Gelman
Disappointingly, the Trump EPA fell far short of a comprehensive evaluation as required in the Lautenberg Chemical Safety Act,” said ADAO Co-founder and President Linda Reinstein. [read post]
12 Jan 2014, 10:51 am
An example of a general legacy is “I give [pounds] 100 to X”: Wood Estate v. [read post]