Search for: "State v House"
Results 7441 - 7460
of 28,333
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Mar 2012, 5:41 am
On Wednesday 7 March 2012, the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights heard the application in the Article 10 case of Animal Defenders International v United Kingdom. [read post]
16 Jul 2008, 4:56 pm
Earlier coverage of Medellin v. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 1:56 pm
The case is U.S. v. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 12:00 am
CD v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWHC 1273 (Admin) Read judgment As readers of this blog will know, control orders have often been successfully challenged in the courts on human rights grounds. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 5:37 pm
Luis V. [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 9:35 am
The leaders of both houses of the state legislature, Senate Majority Leader Mike Gronstal and House Speaker Pat Murphy, promptly issued a joint statement hailing the decision and congratulating LGBT Iowans on their victory. [read post]
8 May 2011, 8:07 am
In Jihad v. [read post]
29 Nov 2007, 11:52 pm
Arthur, Applicant v. [read post]
20 Jul 2007, 12:58 pm
Sharrar v Felsing, 128 F.3d 810, 819 (CA 3, 1997); United States v Al-Azzawy, 784 F.2d 890, 893 (CA 9, 1985); United States v Maez, 872 F.2d 1444, 1450 (CA 10, 1989). [read post]
31 Oct 2020, 10:05 am
Akshar Global Investment Corp. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 9:10 am
When the Court decided to hear King v. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 8:35 am
Y, the defendant in X v. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 6:00 am
Such communications must use the “magic words” articulated by the United States Supreme Court in Buckley v. [read post]
20 Mar 2020, 5:00 am
Mazars and Trump v. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 6:43 am
By Eric Goldman Boring v. [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 3:51 pm
Carter has granted the federal government's motion to dismiss the pending lawsuit of Smelt v. [read post]
31 May 2018, 9:00 am
Munitions were dropped directly on houses, town squares, and churches. [read post]
19 Apr 2020, 11:07 am
Denton v Sout [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 7:38 pm
Lyon Docket: 11-80 Issue: (1) Whether, under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 19(b), courts may adjudicate and compromise legal rights in land to which the United States holds title without the United States’s participation in the litigation; and (2) whether, in light of this Court’s recent decision in United States v. [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 8:43 am
(quoting Housing Auth. of Morristown v. [read post]
