Search for: "State v. Laws"
Results 7441 - 7460
of 156,770
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 May 2020, 8:26 pm
The state statute codified into law the California Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 4:29 pm
On June 13, 2016, the Supreme Court decided Puerto Rico v. [read post]
11 Oct 2007, 3:00 am
You may recall that in Interscope v. [read post]
19 May 2025, 1:12 pm
Prabhash Ranjan, Essential Security Interests in International Investment Law—A Trend towards GATTization Carlotta Ceretelli, Mala Fides Exceptions in Certain Iranian Assets: Lessons for Inter-State and Investment Disputes Berk Demirkol, Local Remedies Rule and Its Application by the International Court of Justice Julian Arato & Fernando Lusa Bordin, Determining the Juridical Status of Companies under International Law Chester Brown & Jeremy K… [read post]
28 Jul 2022, 5:43 am
Here are the materials in Oglala Sioux Tribe v. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 4:20 am
State v. [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 4:21 pm
Nance v. [read post]
27 Jun 2021, 9:01 pm
In United States v. [read post]
8 Nov 2021, 5:03 am
Supreme Court (1) has consistently held that federal antitrust law does not displace state antitrust law (see, for example, California v. [read post]
2 Sep 2022, 2:17 pm
While the Supreme Court’s recent decision in NCAA v. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 4:01 pm
(Michigan v. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 6:18 am
United States v. [read post]
24 Aug 2020, 6:41 am
Thus, the court summarizes: Given the clarity of the plain language of the amendment of the CDA, and the ambiguity of the legislative history relied upon by Plaintiff, the Court thus finds that the CDA does apply to state law civil sex trafficking claims A different court (ML v. [read post]
30 Jul 2009, 4:12 am
State Civil Service Commission's action placing certain competitive class positions in the noncompetitive class annulledMatter of Brynien v New York State Dept. of Civil Service, 2009 NY Slip Op 31656(U), July 25, 2009 Supreme Court, Albany County, Docket Number: 2144/09, Judge: Joseph C. [read post]
21 Jan 2013, 12:02 pm
In State of Wash. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 9:42 am
Headlines about today’s decision in Loper v Raimondo overturning the 40 year-old decision in Chevron v NRDC that granted agencies deference in their interpretation of ambiguous statutes focus on the “massive power grab,” the decision’s “sweeping” nature and call it a “blow” to the administrative state. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 4:09 pm
As the Court explained in United States v. [read post]
26 May 2008, 12:44 am
In Weishuhn v. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 8:39 am
Such a ruling would also create the incongruous result of having a “state agency” that is immune from suit under federal law but not under state law. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 10:30 pm
Secondly, the judgment only says that EU discrimination law does not prohibit such a rule. [read post]
