Search for: "State v. Loss"
Results 7441 - 7460
of 17,550
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jul 2017, 11:59 am
The court stated that Capitol Bank of Chicago v. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 4:31 pm
(d) The judge was wrong to reject MGN’s submission that damages for breach of privacy are compensation for injured feelings and are not intended to mark wrongdoing, such damages being vindicatory in effect and therefore contrary to the principles stated inLumba v Secretary of State for the Home Department. [read post]
8 Aug 2019, 7:37 am
“Human rights violation or abuse” shall mean any harm committed by a State or a business enterprise or non-State actor, through acts or omissions in the context of business activities, against any person or group of persons, individually or collectivelly, including physical or mental injury, emotional suffering, economic loss or substantial impairment of their human rights, including environmental rights.3. [read post]
18 Nov 2019, 2:41 am
Patel v Secretary of State for the Home Department; Secretary of State for the Home Department v Shah, heard 7 May 2019. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 12:20 pm
Attorney Margie Phelps argues for the respondents in Snyder v. [read post]
6 Mar 2011, 11:48 am
As stated above, this is not the end of this issue. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 1:06 pm
’” Ponce v. [read post]
13 Sep 2021, 11:57 am
In Grasshopper House, LLC v. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 11:07 am
May an ERISA plan participant or beneficiary seek restoration of plan losses caused by fiduciary breach under 29 USC 1132(a)(2) without demonstrating individual financial loss or the imminent risk thereof? [read post]
24 Nov 2008, 9:28 am
Co. of N.Y., 10 N.Y.3d 187 (2008) and Panasia Estates v. [read post]
22 Jul 2016, 12:18 pm
Duran v. [read post]
20 Dec 2009, 11:28 am
New York's Third Judicial Department in Ayers v. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 9:30 am
In Pershing, LLC v. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 12:52 pm
Enjoy.JUSTICE K.Section [X] of BUSL v. [read post]
30 May 2022, 7:00 am
Following the United States Supreme Court’s seminal ruling in Brown v. [read post]
7 May 2008, 3:42 pm
Commissioner of Competition v. [read post]
7 May 2008, 10:42 pm
Commissioner of Competition v. [read post]
26 Nov 2015, 5:19 am
Previously, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals in Leonard v. [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 4:29 am
Further, a legal malpractice claim cannot be stated if there is no attorney-client relationship between the parties (Waggoner v Caruso, 68 AD3d 1, 3 [1st Dept 2009], affd 14 NY3d 874 [2010]). [read post]
30 Nov 2021, 11:01 am
The parameters of such a duty were summarised in R (Balajigari) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (2019) EWCA Civ 673: “First, the obligation on the decision-maker is only to take such steps to inform himself as are reasonable. [read post]
