Search for: "State v. Plan"
Results 7441 - 7460
of 29,606
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2017, 1:28 pm
According to Haney v. [read post]
22 Feb 2013, 6:49 am
U.S. v. [read post]
19 Nov 2017, 5:45 am
Barnes v. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 8:21 am
State v. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 3:51 pm
In a 1992 case against abortion rights, Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
17 Feb 2024, 8:42 am
State v. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 6:24 pm
Citing Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 12:34 pm
In 1985, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court upheld the law in Fischer v. [read post]
2 Apr 2008, 9:31 am
United States Forest Service, 390 F. [read post]
9 Jan 2015, 2:53 pm
” The Court held a hearing on November 5 in Johnson v. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 5:13 am
For example, the complaint alleges that “the challenged provisions of SB 94 as applied by the State Bar…” … unconstitutionally infringe upon the rights of Plaintiff, other members of the State Bar and citizens of California seeking legal representation under Article I, Section l0 of the United States Constitution, which states that no State shall pass any law “impairing the Obligation of Contracts. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 8:12 am
It is unlikely that Ammon Bundy and friends, currently illegally occupying the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge in Oregon, planned their protest against federal land management policies in the West to coincide with the upcoming Supreme Court argument in Sturgeon v. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 11:45 am
See Armstrong v. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 8:55 am
Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> National Environmental Dev v. [read post]
9 Nov 2007, 12:12 pm
John B. v. [read post]
1 Jan 2009, 1:53 am
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
3 Sep 2018, 10:53 am
Under the rule, states must submit their plans (referred to as State Implementation Plans or SIPs) by 2018 and start achieving reductions by 2022. [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 4:08 am
The complaint fails to set forth evidentiary facts demonstrating that Leavitt was a participant with Carrington in a common scheme or plan to defraud the plaintiffs, or otherwise aided and abetted Carrington in the commission of fraud (see Fredriksen v Fredriksen, 30 AD3d at 372; Goldfarb v Schwartz, 26 AD3d at 463-464). [read post]
16 Apr 2009, 3:01 pm
In UAW v. [read post]
17 Apr 2020, 1:08 am
The ultimate plan will be implemented in coordination with other states in the multi-state council. [read post]
