Search for: "State v. Saide" Results 7441 - 7460 of 57,125
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Sep 2021, 5:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
Sensibly, no one said well, any amount of time we choose is somewhat arbitrary, so the state can hold people indefinitely. [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
When asked about this situation, Governor Greg Abbott said his administration will “eliminate rape. [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 12:45 pm by Emily Dai
We demand the implementation of international rules,” Raisi said. [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 9:27 am by Joel R. Brandes
” Here, the court’s determination to deny defendant’s request for attorney’s fees was largely based on its assessment of defendant’s credibility at trial regarding the state of her own finances, her failure to fully account for large sums of money that she had received, and her failure to fully account for assets belonging to plaintiff that she purportedly used for his benefit during the period they were separated. [read post]
21 Sep 2021, 4:47 pm by Josh Blackman
Braid, said the doctor performed an ultrasound that detected cardiac activity before performing an abortion, meaning the procedure did in fact violate the new state law. [read post]
21 Sep 2021, 11:52 am by Eric Goldman
The law governs users who meet any of the following: resides in the state, does business in the state, or “shares or receives content on a social media platform in this state. [read post]
21 Sep 2021, 8:38 am by Russell Knight
Queen (1974), 56 Ill.2d 560, 564, 310 N.E.2d 166 “[W]hen an objection is made, specific grounds must be stated and other grounds not stated are waived on review” Jones v. [read post]
21 Sep 2021, 7:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
., LLC v National Wine & Spirits, Inc., 196 3d 883, the Appellate Division, Third Department, said its "longstanding doctrine of judicial estoppel has been succinctly stated as follows:  Where a party assumes a position in one legal [action or] proceeding and succeeds in maintaining that position, that party may not subsequently assume a contrary position in a second [action or] proceeding because its interests have changed. [read post]
21 Sep 2021, 7:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
., LLC v National Wine & Spirits, Inc., 196 3d 883, the Appellate Division, Third Department, said its "longstanding doctrine of judicial estoppel has been succinctly stated as follows:  Where a party assumes a position in one legal [action or] proceeding and succeeds in maintaining that position, that party may not subsequently assume a contrary position in a second [action or] proceeding because its interests have changed. [read post]
20 Sep 2021, 5:56 pm by Gerard N. Magliocca
United States, see my article on The Gold Clause Cases.) [read post]
20 Sep 2021, 3:31 pm by Dennis Crouch
(The Federal Circuit said “yes, it counts. [read post]