Search for: "State v. White"
Results 7441 - 7460
of 11,828
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Oct 2014, 7:57 am
Chism, who is African American, was convicted of murdering a white store clerk. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 1:00 pm
Almost 40 percent of county residents were black, yet the jury was made up of nine whites, two blacks and one American Indian. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 8:19 am
See United States v. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 1:40 pm
Although the postal service has been declared a non-person, today’s decision cannot detract from the federal agency’s heartwarming role in the landmark case of State of New York v. [read post]
18 Dec 2021, 5:01 am
From People v. [read post]
24 May 2023, 11:02 am
In 1997’s United States v. [read post]
11 Jan 2025, 8:36 am
Prior Posts on Section 512(f) * Record Label Sends Bogus Takedown Notice, Defeats 512(f) Claim Anyway–White v. [read post]
16 Oct 2012, 7:48 am
" White v. [read post]
31 Jul 2022, 9:05 pm
Blasband, 634 A.2d 927, 934 n.10 (Del. 1993); White v. [read post]
5 Jan 2024, 3:59 am
Comparable exclusionary thoughts existed in “white” British colonies (Canada, New Zealand, etc.) that introduced their own citizenship, consciously isolating themselves from other (non-white) British colonies (e.g., India). [read post]
31 Jan 2022, 6:48 pm
’” Schwake v. [read post]
21 Nov 2015, 10:32 am
State v. [read post]
26 Feb 2023, 9:25 am
United States, 345 U.S. 594, 625 (1953) and see F.T.C. v. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 5:05 am
Blue Buffalo Company Ltd. v. [read post]
14 Mar 2014, 12:00 pm
Centro Tepeyac v. [read post]
17 Feb 2017, 12:19 pm
Trinity Lutheran Church of Columbia v. [read post]
4 Jul 2007, 3:43 am
Over the past 30 years, an overwhelming majority of people executed in the United States - more than 80 percent - were convicted of killing a white victim, according to Amnesty International.Blacks, however, are about half of all murder victims. [read post]
4 Feb 2025, 4:19 pm
Knauff v. [read post]
28 Jan 2012, 1:02 pm
United States, or the Supreme Court’s Liparota v. [read post]
19 May 2007, 2:17 am
Our explanation of the New Deal transformation is that the public kept reelecting Franklin Roosevelt to the White House and Democrats to the Senate, so that Roosevelt was able to replace eight Justices by the time the Court decided United States v. [read post]
