Search for: "The United States, Petitioner" Results 7441 - 7460 of 8,963
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Apr 2019, 12:46 pm by Jacques Singer-Emery
In a session cut short by a stay from the Court of Military Commission Review (CMCR), the military commission in United States v. [read post]
In Booking.com, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (the “USPTO”) refused to register the mark “BOOKING.COM,” finding it generic. [read post]
6 Jan 2009, 1:41 pm
A federal court can sometimes issue a writ of habeas corpus due to the violation of a federal statute in addition to the violation of the United States Constitution. 28 U.S.C. [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 12:55 pm by Pamela Wolf
Moreover, by refusing to remove the injunction, the appeals court also got it wrong as to the often-asserted discretion in providing deferred action for certain aliens already living in the United States, according to the government. [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 10:03 am by Andrew Hamm
United States Another grant may be on the way for this Confrontation Clause petition, with 54.1% of teams forecasting that outcome and only 32.4% expecting the Court to deny cert. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 12:01 pm
The court therefore concluded that the benefit of suppression would be marginal or nonexistent and that the evidence was admissible under the good-faith rule of United States v. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 3:13 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Further, the court notes that, even if timely, Plaintiff fails to state a DFR cause of action. [read post]
18 May 2010, 1:07 pm by Anna Christensen
”  The Court explained that the text of the Convention, the views of United States Department of State, decisions by foreign courts addressing the meaning of “rights of custody,” and the purpose of the Convention all lead to the conclusion that A.J.A. was indeed “wrongfully removed. [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 4:22 am by Edith Roberts
United States, in which the court held that Congress is required to reimburse health insurance companies for losses created by the Affordable Care Act. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 8:01 am by John Elwood
  United States v. [read post]
13 Feb 2016, 8:17 pm by Stephen Bilkis
What the Section does require is that any petitioner or complainant must be advised of certain procedures. [read post]
Addressing the growing issue of the nation’s housing crisis, the 2023 Annual Homelessness Assessment Report released updated statistics: On a single night in 2023, roughly 653,100 people – or about 20 of every 10,000 people in the United States were experiencing homelessness. [read post]
15 Jan 2012, 6:16 pm by Heidi Meinzer
HB 695 (Prohibiting Fox and Coyote Penning): The Humane Society of the United States (HSUS) has taken this crucial issue head on this year. [read post]
20 Oct 2014, 7:51 am by Lyle Denniston
United States), and whether it is unconstitutional for a state court to exclude an accused individual and defense lawyers from a hearing to examine the legality of prosecutors’ exclusion of minority jurors from serving (Chappell v. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 10:34 am by Matthew Kolken
" In arguing their case Justice Department lawyers advised the Supreme Court that the government "facilitates" the return of deportees who have been forcibly removed from the United States during the pendency of their appeal, and who ultimately win their case. [read post]
25 Nov 2011, 3:00 am by Louis M. Solomon
  The Court found that the New York Convention’s standard applied since the award “arises out of a commericial relationship not entirely between citizens of the United States”. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 10:34 am by Matthew Kolken
" In arguing their case Justice Department lawyers advised the Supreme Court that the government "facilitates" the return of deportees who have been forcibly removed from the United States during the pendency of their appeal, and who ultimately win their case. [read post]
14 Apr 2020, 5:22 pm by Eugene Volokh
Significantly, moreover, the Supreme Court of the United States has admonished that the impermanent nature of a restriction "should not be given exclusive significance one way or the other" in determining whether it is a proper exercise of police power. [read post]