Search for: "US v. Levelle Grant"
Results 7441 - 7460
of 9,109
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jan 2011, 12:19 pm
That state law does not apply to members of the state legislature, but clearly does apply to other elected officials at the state and local level. ** The prescription records case, Sorrell v. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 6:44 am
PierceDocket: 09-1353Issue(s): Whether the court of appeals misinterpreted the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act, 42 U.S.C. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 11:03 am
General Motors Co. v. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 8:52 am
At trial, Mayo contended that the claims impermissibly preempt use of natural phenomena; namely, correlations between drug metabolite levels and efficacy and toxicity. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 1:24 pm
The case is Ashley II of Charleston, LLC v. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 1:24 pm
The case is Ashley II of Charleston, LLC v. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 10:26 am
" Fleischer said this will also make the use of attorneys more costly to the parties. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 10:19 am
The California Supreme Court has granted review of this case. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 7:56 am
The Fourth Circuit opinion in United States v. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 4:08 pm
Because the jury's damages award was fundamentally tainted by the use of a legally inadequate methodology, this court affirms the grant of a new trial on damages. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 6:44 am
Michigan Supreme Court Justice Maura Corrigan is expected to resign from the Court in order to serve in newly-minted Governor Rick Snyder's cabinet; most likely as the Director of the Michigan Department of Human Services.This gives us pause on several levels. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 6:16 am
They attacked the rule on three levels. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 2:59 pm
Sunnyvale West Neighborhood Assn. v. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 1:28 pm
So some gamers have resorted to the use of bots (automated game-playing software robots) to make their way more quickly from the more tedious early levels of the game to the more interesting upper levels. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 12:02 pm
Environmental Protection Information Center, et al. v. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 11:48 am
National Association of Home Builders v. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 4:58 am
Hodge, which rejects the argument that the US Supreme Court decision in Oregon v. [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 10:13 pm
Even assuming that there was consistency at each sub-level of the product line, the end result was that the same mark was being applied to the same product class, but at various quality levels. [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 12:13 pm
London Market,the Wisconsin Supreme Court ruled that a third level excess insurer’s duty to defend was triggered by the refusal of underlying insurers to defend in. [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 11:45 am
A New York Appellate Court recently reversed a trial level decision granting summary judgment in favor of the defendant in the 2009 case of Esther Jacobs v. [read post]
