Search for: "United States v. Close" Results 7441 - 7460 of 14,200
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jan 2015, 4:31 am by Kevin LaCroix
It has now been confirmed that two companies in the United States have potentially been the subject of cyber-terrorism. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 4:37 am by Matthew R. Arnold, Esq.
G & K appealed, and a panel of judges on the United States 5th Circuit Court of Appeals recently revisited the term “humiliation” in the context of the Auto-Owners policy. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
United States), for federal agents, and to 1961 (Mapp v. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 6:54 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
As of the close of 2014, Wal-Mart had been cited a total of 571 times in lower federal and state court rulings. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 4:14 am by Kevin LaCroix
As discussed here, in Public Employees’ Retirement System of Mississippi, v. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 3:31 pm by nedaj
Advisers registered in other states should consult with legal counsel about those states’ custody requirements. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 5:35 am by Joel R. Brandes
It further found that  his desire to be close to his children led him to ask Mary to see about his  immigration status so that he could return to the United States. [read post]
3 Jan 2015, 7:37 pm by Bill Marler
Norovirus cases were increasing throughout Europe and the Pacific at the same time. [12] One issue with cruise ships is the close contact between people as living quarters are so close, and despite education efforts, there still seems to be a lack of public understanding regarding how the illness is spread. [13] On the other hand, reporting occurs much more quickly in these situations because of the close proximity and concentration of illness, allowing for the quicker… [read post]
2 Jan 2015, 8:51 am by Lyle Denniston
Meanwhile, the Supreme Court is now set to consider on January 9 whether to grant review of any or all of the second round of same-sex marriage cases to reach it in the wake of widespread activity in lower courts since the Justices last spoke on the rights of same-sex couples in United States v. [read post]
2 Jan 2015, 6:30 am
First a word about the plaintiff: Some Kat readers may recall that Pom Wonderful prevailed in a closely watched decision given by the United States Supreme Court on June 12, 2014, Pom Wonderful LLC v Coca Cola Company. [read post]
1 Jan 2015, 3:29 pm by Kirk Jenkins
The Court then turned to the question of whether plaintiffs had adequately stated causes of action under Counts IV and V. [read post]
31 Dec 2014, 7:09 am
” Epistemologically, at least, this strikes me as a pretty close question. [read post]