Search for: "W W Long" Results 7441 - 7460 of 13,937
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Oct 2014, 9:26 am
  [W]hen an individual executes a valid HIPAA authorization, he waives all HIPAA protection as to the health information covered by the authorization, including the protections against litigation-related disclosures. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 7:25 am by John Lewis
’”  “But, [w]hat constitutes such individual participation has been the subject of some debate and confusion. [read post]
13 Oct 2014, 4:06 am by Kevin LaCroix
  Discussion Judge Guilford’s opinion in this case stands in interesting contrast with the August 19, 2013 decision of Northern District of Georgia Judge Richard W. [read post]
11 Oct 2014, 9:45 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  It’s easy to get a descriptive mark on the primary register w/o secondary meaning. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 9:12 am
  Even when our side doesn’t think there’s liability, there can still be damages.All of this is an overly long introduction to this relatively rare post devoted solely to a damages issue. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 8:46 am by John Elwood
But before we do, we should note that the Court’s long-running streak of only granting cert. in relisted cases ended last Thursday. [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 5:01 am
  It disposed of that issue relatively quickly, noting that [w]e are not aware of any case law nor has [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 7:19 am by Andrew S. Williams, Esq.
RECOMMENDATIONS Annual returns due in 2016 sound like they are a long way off. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 6:00 am by Trevor Cutaiar
  The majority opinion was about fifteen pages long and was followed by nearly sixty pages of concurring and dissenting opinions. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 5:36 am by Amy Howe
At the blog of the National Conference of State Legislators, Lisa Soronen discusses the cases granted from the Court’s “Long Conference” that may affect states. [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 1:58 pm by Nathalie Martin
How long will we be seeing signs like this in our communities? [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 11:56 am
The EEOC's Reply Brief reframes the issue as:By holding that an employer may discriminate against a job applicant or employee based on practices that the employer correctly believes to be religious, so long as the employer does not have “actual know ledge” of the need for a religious accommodation based on the explicit statements of the applicant or employee, the Tenth Circuit . . . [read post]