Search for: "York v York"
Results 7441 - 7460
of 51,489
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
Hence, even setting aside the inconsistencies between petitioner's testimony and the description of the incident as set forth in the relevant incident reports, which presented credibility issues for the Hearing Officer and respondent to resolve (see Matter of Verille v Gardner, 177 AD3d 1068, 1070 [2019]; Matter of Angelino v New York State Comptroller, 176 AD3d at 1379; see also Matter of Harris v New York State & Local Retirement Sys., 191 AD3d… [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
Hence, even setting aside the inconsistencies between petitioner's testimony and the description of the incident as set forth in the relevant incident reports, which presented credibility issues for the Hearing Officer and respondent to resolve (see Matter of Verille v Gardner, 177 AD3d 1068, 1070 [2019]; Matter of Angelino v New York State Comptroller, 176 AD3d at 1379; see also Matter of Harris v New York State & Local Retirement Sys., 191 AD3d… [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
Hence, even setting aside the inconsistencies between petitioner's testimony and the description of the incident as set forth in the relevant incident reports, which presented credibility issues for the Hearing Officer and respondent to resolve (see Matter of Verille v Gardner, 177 AD3d 1068, 1070 [2019]; Matter of Angelino v New York State Comptroller, 176 AD3d at 1379; see also Matter of Harris v New York State & Local Retirement Sys., 191 AD3d… [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
Hence, even setting aside the inconsistencies between petitioner's testimony and the description of the incident as set forth in the relevant incident reports, which presented credibility issues for the Hearing Officer and respondent to resolve (see Matter of Verille v Gardner, 177 AD3d 1068, 1070 [2019]; Matter of Angelino v New York State Comptroller, 176 AD3d at 1379; see also Matter of Harris v New York State & Local Retirement Sys., 191 AD3d… [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
Hence, even setting aside the inconsistencies between petitioner's testimony and the description of the incident as set forth in the relevant incident reports, which presented credibility issues for the Hearing Officer and respondent to resolve (see Matter of Verille v Gardner, 177 AD3d 1068, 1070 [2019]; Matter of Angelino v New York State Comptroller, 176 AD3d at 1379; see also Matter of Harris v New York State & Local Retirement Sys., 191 AD3d… [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
Hence, even setting aside the inconsistencies between petitioner's testimony and the description of the incident as set forth in the relevant incident reports, which presented credibility issues for the Hearing Officer and respondent to resolve (see Matter of Verille v Gardner, 177 AD3d 1068, 1070 [2019]; Matter of Angelino v New York State Comptroller, 176 AD3d at 1379; see also Matter of Harris v New York State & Local Retirement Sys., 191 AD3d… [read post]
29 Jul 2021, 1:45 pm
In United States v. [read post]
29 Jul 2021, 1:18 pm
Knowles, Associate Professor of Political Science at the State University of New York at Oswego, has published Making Minimum Wage: Elsie Parrish versus the West Coast Hotel Company (University of Oklahoma Press):The US Supreme Court’s 1937 decision in West Coast Hotel v. [read post]
29 Jul 2021, 12:24 pm
v=CemYFxGfX9I&t=1s https://youtu.be/42mrmHkcu34 If you have any questions and would like to discuss the appeal process, please feel free to call me at 516-248-0040. [read post]
29 Jul 2021, 11:16 am
In an opinion by Judge Kearse, the Circuit ruled in United States v. [read post]
29 Jul 2021, 10:40 am
Supreme Court’s recent ruling in TransUnion, LLC. v. [read post]
29 Jul 2021, 3:50 am
In an industry focused on revenue and profit, where does something like customer experience stand in the priorities of legal providers? [read post]
28 Jul 2021, 12:11 pm
Mauia v. [read post]
28 Jul 2021, 6:08 am
The striking of a pleading may be appropriate where there is a clear showing that the failure to comply with discovery demands or court-ordered discovery was the result of willful and contumacious conduct (see Ozeri v Ozeri, 135 AD3d 838, 839 [2016]; McArthur v New York City Hous. [read post]
28 Jul 2021, 3:50 am
Table of Contents Key Findings Introduction What Is the Tax Gap and What Proposals Are Available? [read post]
28 Jul 2021, 12:37 am
It is an approach shunned in other jurisdictions; for example in New York law, the newsworthiness of a story is assessed as a whole so that photographs that accompany a newsworthy story – understood in the widest sense to include matters such as lifestyle and fashion – are automatically covered by this exception (Howell v New York Post 81 NY2d 115 (1993), Costlow v Cusimano 34 Ad2d 196 (1970)). [read post]
27 Jul 2021, 3:21 pm
The case is Chrysafis v. [read post]
27 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
" Citing Gould v New York CityPolice Dept., 89 NY2d 267, the Appellate Division noted that "All government records are ... presumptively open for public inspection and copying unless they fall within one of the enumerated exemptions of Public Officers Law §87(2)", typically referred to as FOIL. [read post]
27 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
" Citing Gould v New York CityPolice Dept., 89 NY2d 267, the Appellate Division noted that "All government records are ... presumptively open for public inspection and copying unless they fall within one of the enumerated exemptions of Public Officers Law §87(2)", typically referred to as FOIL. [read post]
27 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
" Citing Gould v New York CityPolice Dept., 89 NY2d 267, the Appellate Division noted that "All government records are ... presumptively open for public inspection and copying unless they fall within one of the enumerated exemptions of Public Officers Law §87(2)", typically referred to as FOIL. [read post]
