Search for: "Young v. State" Results 7441 - 7460 of 8,793
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 May 2008, 6:34 am
Patterson on the Rowling v. [read post]
11 May 2010, 1:31 pm by Lawrence Cunningham
That’s a perfectly fine scholarly record but not exactly one to which young legal academics should aspire. [read post]
7 Jun 2007, 2:11 pm
  In the May post, I reported that Springsteen's conviction had been overturned because prosecutors introduced portions of Scott's confession at Springsteen's trial without giving Springsteen the chance to cross-examine Scott, a practice now outlawed by the United States Supreme Court in Crawford v. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 1:14 pm by Gregory Forman
Earlier this week, the South Carolina Court of Appeals, in Daily v. [read post]
27 Jul 2024, 6:15 am by Lawrence Solum
His pioneering contrarianism made it acceptable to believe that the Court should side with liberty against encroachments by both state and federal government. [read post]
5 Jul 2008, 11:05 am
interview: (IP tango) Events 7 July: PLI briefing webcast ‘Life after Quanta v LGE: What every patent lawyer needs to know’: (PLI), 7-15 July/16-18 July: 2nd Transatlantic IP summer academy, modules one and two – Alicante/Milan: (IPKat), 9 July 2008: ALI & ABA webcast ‘Quanta v LG: What you should know’: (Patent Docs), 11 July: CIPA moot to improve participants’ understanding of procedures of EPO Technical… [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 9:57 am by Ben
 However, when considering the effect of a parody, he held that it is a common understanding that a parody must have a somehow humorous effect, and that it is left to (seemingly the courts) Member States to define what is humorous, also depending on different national sensitivities. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 8:14 am by Florian Mueller
(United States International Trade Commission) in September and in Munich (Munich I Regional Court) in October. [read post]
15 Mar 2021, 7:58 am by Alexander Vindman
Unlike with Trump in the impeachment trial, the First Amendment clearly does apply here, and it has a very high standard for incitement under Brandenburg v. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 2:18 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
 Ambiguity between how much of the discourse in A2K is targeted at patent v. copyright. [read post]
10 May 2018, 9:49 am by Richard Hunt
Young, 217CV01642KJMKJN, 2018 WL 1875698, at *3 (E.D. [read post]
29 Nov 2019, 9:05 pm by News Desk
Silliker Lecturer is selected by a committee including a representative from Merieux NutriSciences, the Program Committee Chairperson, and the IAFP President.2019 Recipient: Robert V. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 12:56 pm by Jessie Canon
A unanimous Supreme Court overruled longstanding precedent established in Betts v. [read post]