Search for: "All Defendants" Results 7461 - 7480 of 165,028
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Feb 2014, 6:30 am
Since, all that is required to demonstrate a complaint about discrimination is an understanding that the plaintiff is protesting discriminatory conduct, the plaintiff responded to the defendants' argument, "Like, duh." that her discussion with management was to advise the company of the wrongness of the hiring dentist's conduct and cause him to change his course of action. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 5:47 am
  The defendant claims that: (1) the trial court improperly denied his motion to dismiss all charges pursuant to a previous contractual plea agreement; and (2) improper statements by the prosecutor during closing argument deprived the defendant of his right to due process. [read post]
25 Apr 2013, 7:19 am by Jeff Kosseff
Warren Hospital alleges that two anonymous individuals hacked into its web and email servers and sent inappropriate and defamatory messages to all hospital employees. [read post]
25 Nov 2023, 8:57 pm by Jon Katz
Of course, an outright unconditional dismissal or acquittal avoids all of those expenses. [read post]
16 Apr 2021, 2:56 pm by Cross & Smith
  After all, what may seem like a simple case could be complicated by road visibility issues, product defect issues, and insurance issues, among many other factors. [read post]
8 Oct 2016, 7:01 am by Andrew Delaney
In reading subsection (g), the SCOV concludes that the language is inclusive of all criminal convictions, and does not limit applicability based on the nature of the initial crime to those not listed under the other statute. [read post]
21 Nov 2012, 4:18 pm
The motion by the defendants for leave to reargue separate orders are granted and upon re-argument the summary judgment motion from the doctor is granted to the extent that all of the causes of action that were asserted against him. [read post]
12 Apr 2016, 7:10 am by Docket Navigator
"At trial, [defendant] presented evidence of invalidity due to obviousness as to all ten of the patents-in-suit, as well as anticipation evidence as to six of the ten patents. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 6:11 am
  The panel, consisting of Cremins, Crawford and Schuman, Js., rendered a unanimous verdict of guilty on all of the charges except aiding and abetting murder, on which a majority of the panel found the defendant guilty, and thereafter rendered judgment in accordance with the verdict and imposed a total effective sentence of sixty years imprisonment. [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 5:00 am
As such, summary judgment was granted with respect to the claims of recklessness but denied in all other respects. [read post]
29 Aug 2017, 12:20 pm by Joel R. Brandes
The defendant moved, inter alia, “for a set-off against plaintiff’s entitlement to his equity share of the former marital home in an amount equal to all monies owed for QDRO arrears. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 11:45 am
 Given those realities, it's not at all surprising that the Ninth Circuit denies relief.But, still, an interesting topic. [read post]
29 Aug 2017, 12:20 pm by Joel R. Brandes
The defendant moved, inter alia, “for a set-off against plaintiff’s entitlement to his equity share of the former marital home in an amount equal to all monies owed for QDRO arrears. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 1:56 pm by Jon Sands
  After all, the government had a compelling interest in national security.The decision is here:https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2016/12/05/14-30217.pdf [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 4:15 am
The court stated the overarching issue as follows: "whether, considering the entire record and drawing all reasonable inferences in Pro-Football's favor, the Court should grant Defendants' Motion to Dismiss because Pro-Football cannot bring an action against Defendants who have no commercial interest in the mark under §1071(b) of the Lanham Act. [read post]
16 Nov 2013, 11:11 am
Therefore, the state could not use the evidence of the stolen items, and all of the charges were thrown out. [read post]