Search for: "Battle v. State"
Results 7461 - 7480
of 8,263
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Apr 2009, 2:22 pm
Custer Battles, LLC, 376 F. [read post]
7 Apr 2009, 11:26 am
Yes, word is that the first major band to use file-sharing as a business model1 has agreed to step up on behalf of the defense in the whole Sony (et al) v. [read post]
7 Apr 2009, 9:38 am
If a gay or lesbian couple joins together in marriage...Landmark Gay Marriage Couple Divorces In the landmark Massachusetts case of Goodridge v. [read post]
7 Apr 2009, 9:22 am
The adequacy of the consideration for a covenant not to compete entered into after the commencement of employment was the issue in Hejl v. [read post]
7 Apr 2009, 3:00 am
Mary Queen of the Third Millennium, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Apr 2009, 5:35 am
" Beck v. [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 10:37 pm
The biggest defeat here is that purchasers and sellers of trademark keyword advertising can no longer get a trademark infringement lawsuit dismissed at an early state for failure to state a claim - and will instead have to endure some discovery and fight through to summary judgment or maybe even trial. [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 7:23 pm
LLC v W. [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 4:40 pm
In its October 2008 decision in American Home Products Corp. v. [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 3:56 pm
Lower appellate courts can’t overrule higher ones; they just can’t, no more than a lowly squaddie may draw up detailed battle plans, a state governor set federal immigration policy, or an older sibling overrule a curfew set by the head of the household. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 2:31 pm
Supreme Court's unanimous opinion in the "ceded lands" case, Hawaii v. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 1:04 am
The most important result of the battle may be a controversial D.C. [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 9:23 pm
The most important provision of the Constitution is the one giving each State an equal voice in the Senate. [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 2:30 pm
Supporters note the momentum they gained March 4 when the Supreme Court, in Wyeth v. [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 1:07 pm
In Arista Records v. [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 11:48 am
Supporters note the momentum they gained March 4 when the Supreme Court, in Wyeth v. [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 7:20 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: US CAFC: Continuation limits invalid; limits on claims and RCEs are ok: Tafas v Doll (Patently-O) (Law360) (Hal Wegner) (IAM) (Patent Baristas) (Promote the Progress) (Patent Docs) (Patent Docs) (Patent Docs) (IP Spotlight) (Inventive Step) (IP Watchdog) (Washington State Patent Law Blog) (Anticipate This!) [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 5:22 am
Levine as follows:In Wyeth v. [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 1:04 am
Reynolds and Altria in Gelep v. [read post]
26 Mar 2009, 10:51 am
Perkins, 748 F.2d 1519, 1533 (11th Cir.1984); United States v. [read post]
