Search for: "Black v. Black"
Results 7461 - 7480
of 12,734
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Sep 2013, 12:46 pm
The indictment could simply allege that the defendant committed the underlying crime in whole or substantial part because of a belief or perception of the race, or sex, or sexual orientation, or whatever of a person in accordance with People v McDowd. [read post]
18 Sep 2007, 8:31 pm
(Cleveland was also the place where the American League's first Black player suited up, and where the major leagues' first Black manager dressed in a ghastly all-red uniform. [read post]
14 Nov 2009, 6:05 pm
The Southern deputies who tortured confessions out of random black men didn't want to solve a particular crime, but to terrify black people in general. [read post]
6 Jan 2023, 6:56 am
” The status of the morning after pill has been a key issue since the Supreme Court overruled Roe v. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 10:42 am
By Rebecca Tushnet and Eric Goldman TrafficSchool.com, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 7:02 am
(Vaden v. [read post]
22 Dec 2017, 2:43 am
Fry v. [read post]
29 May 2013, 7:00 am
“Sua sponte” whispered a small black bird. [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 3:05 am
Consultants, Ltd. v. [read post]
10 Aug 2022, 4:08 pm
Aldridge v. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 10:59 am
Ragin v. [read post]
15 Oct 2018, 9:57 am
“Marbury v. [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 4:00 am
Lo contrario sería expresar, casi histriónicamente, que “black lives don’t matter“. [read post]
12 Apr 2015, 9:01 pm
That case held, among other things, that blacks, even freed black slaves, could not be U.S. citizens. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 9:12 pm
In Frank v. [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 3:38 am
State v. [read post]
3 Jun 2009, 6:46 am
In 1886, the Supreme Court ruled in Presser v. [read post]
8 Dec 2009, 3:47 am
The prosecutor struck the only black male on the jury, and Williams being black, this satisfied the prima facie requirement. [read post]
2 Nov 2022, 6:20 am
Most recently, in 2015, the Supreme Court ruled in Reed v. [read post]
14 Oct 2008, 9:01 pm
The Court spent an hour Tuesday talking about different approaches, in Bartlett v. [read post]
