Search for: "CONVERSE v CONVERSE" Results 7461 - 7480 of 15,439
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 May 2014, 10:56 am
The Indiana Court of Appeals has discussed "theft" and "conversion" as they pertain to takings of intellectual property in several recent cases (see, for example, here and here) and has made it clear that criminal statutes often apply differently to an unlawful taking of intellectual property. [read post]
9 Jan 2013, 1:20 pm by WIMS
Tarrant Reg'l Water Dist., 656 F.3d at 1250; see also Skull Valley Band of Goshute Indians v. [read post]
28 Sep 2014, 11:21 pm
* 5 seconds of contact time is sufficient, says Arnold JDavid reports on Compactgtl Ltd v Velocys Plc & Others [2014] EWHC 2951 (Pat), an Arnoldian decision of the Patents Court, England and Wales. [read post]
31 Aug 2022, 6:40 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
But his position as an officer of the union does not transform his employment-related conversations into speech as a citizen. [read post]
12 Jul 2013, 6:53 am by Josh Sturtevant
It seems incredible for so many reasons that I first published the reprinted post below over a year ago...The Dual Critical Role and Culpability of the Media in State v. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 6:46 am by Rachel, Law Clerk
75 questions Rob Ford hasn’t answered MacKay points finger at others in judicial diversity rowB.C. tech firm readying pot-sniffing breathalyzer, but no consensus on how much is too much to drive How Canadians can be charged with driving under the influence of cannabis without ever smoking a joint Justice Ginsburg Writes Blistering Dissent On Hobby Lobby Ranking The Best In US Biglaw: The Am Law A-List (2014) Supreme Court Declines Case Contesting Ban on Gay ‘Conversion… [read post]
19 Sep 2022, 4:06 pm by Reference Staff
One of the most famous censorship cases to land in the courts is United States v. [read post]
24 Feb 2019, 4:16 am by Lev Sugarman
Pildes unpacked the implications of the 1983 INS v. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 2:28 am by Jani
Luckily, the highest court in the European Union has, yet again, graciously stepped up to the challenge to answer this question.The case in question was Pez Hejduk v EnergieAgentur.NRW GmbH, decided only a bit over a month ago. [read post]