Search for: "Court v. Administrative Office" Results 7461 - 7480 of 13,889
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Mar 2012, 2:51 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Supreme Court properly denied the motion of defendant David Rodriguez, Esq. and the motion of defendants Noemi Fernandez-Hiltz, Esq. and The Law Offices of Noemi Fernandez, PLLC seeking summary judgment dismissing the complaint. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 9:03 pm by Lyle Denniston
 Keisler of the Washington, D.C., office of Sidley Austin, with thirty minutes of time. [read post]
10 May 2011, 11:56 am by Steve Davies
After reviewing the administrative record, the district court granted summary judgment to the agencies. [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 10:48 am by John Floyd
  Having exhausted administrative remedies, the NACDL in February 2014, filed a formal complaint in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia against the Executive Office of the U.S. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 7:05 pm by Mary Dwyer
MacDonald 12-1490Issue: Whether the Virginia courts unreasonably applied Lawrence v. [read post]
9 Dec 2015, 11:47 am by Shea Denning
On the implied consent side, the Court of Appeals of Idaho in Bobeck v. [read post]
9 Dec 2015, 11:47 am by Shea Denning
On the implied consent side, the Court of Appeals of Idaho in Bobeck v. [read post]
28 Jan 2023, 7:32 am
  The state, then, in a markets privileging environment is caught on the horns of potentially incompatible objectives: the convergence of economic and administrative collectives around notions of compliance and state duty; or the promotion of risk taking in economic ventures to create prosperity and enhance the production of value that can then be tapped for all kinds of purposes. [read post]
6 Jan 2025, 5:05 am by Jeff Welty
On New Year’s Eve, the North Carolina Court of Appeals issued an opinion in No Limit Games, LLC v. [read post]
13 Sep 2014, 10:41 pm
In Matter of Stortecky v Mazzone and Matter of Vitole, Matter of Phelan, it was held that the court bears the ultimate responsibility for approving legal fees that are charged to an estate and has the discretion to determine what constitutes reasonable compensation for legal services rendered in the course of the administration of an estate. [read post]