Search for: "Does, A-H" Results 7461 - 7480 of 16,615
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Feb 2017, 1:35 pm
For the reasons set forth below, we conclude that the GCSPA does not authorize an award of punitive damages. [read post]
30 Sep 2023, 12:24 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
But this reality does suggest that the key premise of a preliminary injunction—a showing of a likelihood of success on the merits—is missing. [read post]
5 Aug 2017, 3:56 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
Patheon, an unreported 2014 opinion from the Northern District of Florida (“the Court does not find that Patheon is relying on these documents as a defense to Procaps’ claims. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 11:13 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Thus, the Commission can choose to apply Title I and not Title II—but if it does, its choice will be meaningless. [read post]
20 May 2009, 5:03 am
., at 4(citation omitted); in the Sixth and Seventh Circuits, case law held that “reliance on a pre-PDA differential accrual rule to determine pension benefits does not constitute a current violation of Title VII,” id. [read post]
21 Nov 2014, 8:00 am by Marc Patterson
  The CFPB staff noted that Form H-25(h) in Appendix H is an example of how to divide page two into separate pages. [read post]
18 Aug 2018, 12:23 pm by Larry
Under 50 CFR 216.24(h)(1)(ii)(A), it is illegal to import fish or fish products from a fishery without a valid comparability finding. [read post]
16 Nov 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
But what exactly does my right to private property entail? [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 8:55 pm
Id. at *12 (text added). [3] [Whether] the district court [erred in finding] that [the] Hechtor [reference] does not anticipate the asserted claims of the '149 patent.... [read post]
12 Aug 2014, 9:54 pm by H. Scott Leviant
Likewise, the scope of Antelope Valley's right to control the work does not in itself determine whether that right is amenable to common proof.Ayala, 59 Cal. 4th at 534. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 9:08 am by Jonathan H. Adler
But what if you purchase a debt and then try to collect it for yourself— does that make you a “debt collector” too? [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 7:28 am
District of Columbia, 670 F. 3d 1244 (CADC 2011) (“We ask first whether a particular provision impinges upon a right protected by the Second Amendment; if it does, then we go on to determine whether the provision passes muster under the appropriate level of constitutional scrutiny”), with id., at 1271 (Kavanaugh, J., dissenting) (“In my view, Heller and McDonald leave little doubt that courts are to assess gun bans and regulations… [read post]
16 Nov 2021, 10:20 am by Jonathan H. Adler
That there is "substantial evidence" for an agency conclusion does not mean that the agency is correct, let alone that all the evidence points in the same direction. [read post]
1 Mar 2020, 7:29 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
Finally, having reached that conclusion, the Court need not—and does not—reach Plaintiffs' alternative legal challenges. [read post]