Search for: "English v. English" Results 7461 - 7480 of 11,204
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Apr 2012, 12:01 am by George M. Wallace
No longer tethered to a desk, a land line, a fax machine, or the material world, the contemporary lawyer is freed to commune with the delightful by products of V. planifolia whilst still practicing law. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 12:01 am by George M. Wallace
No longer tethered to a desk, a land line, a fax machine, or the material world, the contemporary lawyer is freed to commune with the delightful by products of V. planifolia whilst still practicing law. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 12:01 am by George M. Wallace
No longer tethered to a desk, a land line, a fax machine, or the material world, the contemporary lawyer is freed to commune with the delightful by products of V. planifolia whilst still practicing law. [read post]
31 Mar 2012, 9:59 am
Normally, amendments are allowed in the pleadings to avoid multiplicity of litigations.Related Posts:Amendment of Pleadings : Broad PrinciplesAmendment of Pleadings : Written Statement v. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 11:00 am
Yet when dealing with a client who is a non-native English speaker, bringing in a foreign language interpreter is a necessity. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 8:01 am by Pratt Judith
  And all of them bilingual English and Chinese. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 7:59 am by christopher
This post may only make sense to English football fans. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 5:29 am by Joshua Matz
  For this blog, Amy describes the argument “In Plain English. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 3:00 am by Ted Folkman
The English translation of Mexico’s older declarations was ambiguous, as we saw in the discussion of Mitchell v. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 11:00 pm by INFORRM
It was coincidental that the cricket libel case, Cairns v Modi and Lady Justice Arden’s speech on media intrusion and human rights “Striking the Balance” came out on the same day. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 2:26 pm
The Opinion of Advocate General Niilo Jääskinen in Case C-509/10 Josef and Thomas Geistbeck v Saatgut? [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 6:05 am by Mark Tushnet
” I can understand translating an obscure Latin phrase into English, but what on earth was he thinking when he translated a perfectly understandable English phrase into the Latin from which, I’ll concede, it was derived? [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 5:16 am
The General Court gave its decision today in a Community trade mark appeal, Case T-369/10 You-Q BV v OHIM. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 3:49 am
The Development Contract was governed by and to be construed in accordance with English law and the parties agreed to submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the English courts (clause 8(e)).6. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 9:55 am by Ezra Rosser
Salomone General Essays The First Amendment’s Borders: The Place of Holder v. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 9:30 am by Thomas Lee
For instance, the ATS was successfully invoked by a French privateer (an alien plaintiff) in Bolchos v. [read post]