Search for: "FAIR v. THE STATE"
Results 7461 - 7480
of 30,500
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Apr 2019, 11:22 am
The Court stated, “An unprofitable business may still have a positive fair market value. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 9:11 am
BMG v Cox is good, but music industry is still unhappy. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 8:20 am
The OECD Fair Information Practice Principles, which underlie many privacy laws and frameworks in the U.S., Europe and elsewhere, articulate a “collection limitation principle. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 8:14 am
” The name derives from Auer v. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 5:03 am
The DOL states in the Notice that these and other developments have generated a tremendous amount of attention, concern, and debate about joint employer status in every context, including the FLSA. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 11:00 pm
Should it be equated with the virtually absolute immunity that states enjoyed when the IOIA was enacted? [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 1:55 pm
Au New Haven, LLC v. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 1:41 pm
The attorneys cite Bianchi v. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 7:02 am
V. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 6:30 am
” In Brown v. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 5:02 am
Sullivan, Gertz v. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 5:02 am
Sullivan, Gertz v. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 4:31 am
Kopf Senior United States District Jud [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 4:00 am
The plaintiff [Petitioner] in this action was initially employed by the City of Lockport [Lockport] in a position in a collective bargaining unit represented by the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees [AFSCME]. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 4:00 am
The plaintiff [Petitioner] in this action was initially employed by the City of Lockport [Lockport] in a position in a collective bargaining unit represented by the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees [AFSCME]. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 2:25 am
Koh's FTC v. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 9:01 pm
The Court first recognized that right in 1973 in Roe v. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 3:46 pm
In two joined cases, Abanca Corporación Bancaria SA v García Salamanca Santos (Case C-70/17) and Bankia SA v Lau Mendoza and Rodríguez Ramírez (Case C-179/17) EU:2019:250, the European Court of Justice (ECJ) considered the power of national courts to substitute national law provisions to save a loan where deleting unfair terms would prejudice the consumer. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 1:50 pm
P’ship v. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 1:41 pm
Will work with Member States. [read post]
