Search for: "Head v State"
Results 7461 - 7480
of 14,744
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Oct 2014, 10:11 am
In so doing, the court admitting that it was disagreeing with another federal district court in that state, Cordy v. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 4:00 am
Whereas all American coins state, “In God We Trust,” all Canadian coins now state: “D G Regina” in an arc in front of Queen Elizabeth II’s silhouette, which stands for, Dei Gratia Regina, which means, “By the Grace of God, Queen. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 9:28 pm
Accordingly, the Defendant’s motion for Summary Judgment was granted as to those counts of Plaintiffs’ complaint that fall under the “prior restraint” heading, namely Counts II, III, V, and VI. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 9:01 pm
In a recent ruling, Connor H. v. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 6:17 pm
In 1989, with torches and pitchforks, Congress chased the Tariff Schedule of the United States away from our black and white villages, never to be seen again. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 10:46 am
Over the weekend, the United States and its allies conducted 22 air strikes against ISIS forces inside Iraq. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 8:12 am
State v. [read post]
25 Oct 2014, 5:14 am
Keep arms and heads inside the bus at all times. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 9:54 am
State v. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 9:54 am
State v. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 12:44 am
For clarity, I am not stating that this is what Google is doing, but one has to be suspicious as to why they allow such results to remain hidden even after third parties have highlighted their unsuitability. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 9:01 pm
Department of Transportation v. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 6:06 pm
¶37 (quoting Buie v. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 11:06 am
” In the book, Katagiri notes that “when insurgent groups challenge powerful states, defeat is not always inevitable,” and examines “the circumstances and tactics” that allow non-state actors to succeed “against foreign governments while others fail. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 10:41 am
The majority concluded that, under Feiner v. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 9:46 am
Andrus Ansip is nominally the “team leader” on the reforms, with Věra Jourová, Günther Oettinger and Dimitris Avramopoulos competing to be heard on the balance between fundamental rights, business freedoms and the powers of public authorities (e.g. state surveillance), respectively. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 8:03 am
But sometimes you have to wait to exhaust state law procedures before diving head first into federal court. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 6:00 am
Chief Justice Lamer has stated extra-judicially that “[t]he Charter can be understood to give effect to Canada’s international legal obligations, and should therefore be interpreted in a way that conforms to those obligations. [read post]
22 Oct 2014, 8:10 pm
State v. [read post]
22 Oct 2014, 8:23 am
[1] Tsosie v. [read post]
