Search for: "In Re: Does v."
Results 7461 - 7480
of 30,134
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Mar 2019, 12:00 am
The panel held that the defendants did not satisfy the five Bauman factors required for a writ of mandamus, Bauman v. [read post]
3 Mar 2019, 8:51 pm
This request does not mean that the Committee has found a violation yet - it is an urgent measure to preserve Lula’s right, pending the case consideration on the merits, which will take place next year.It is important to note that although this response is being provided through the UN Human Rights Office, it is a decision of the Human Rights Committee, which is made up of independent experts. [read post]
3 Mar 2019, 3:01 pm
Article 8 does not give a right to a home, Chapman v UK (2001) EHRR 18, and it was the discriminatory impact on people seeking a home that was at the centre of the claimant’s case. [read post]
2 Mar 2019, 5:16 pm
” See Chamberlain v. [read post]
2 Mar 2019, 5:42 am
Article by Rob Robinson The Predictive Coding Technologies and Protocols Spring 2019 Survey The Predictive Coding Technologies and Protocols Survey is a non-scientific survey designed to help provide a general understanding of the use of predictive coding technologies, protocols, and workflows by data discovery and legal discovery professionals within the eDiscovery ecosystem. [read post]
2 Mar 2019, 4:14 am
The application sought to repress the unauthorized use of Banksy's registered trade marks and reproductions of his/her artworks in the context of an art exhibition in Milan.The text of the decision in RG 52442/2018 Pest Control Office Limited v 24 Ore Cultura s.r.l. is available here.Let's see what happened.BackgroundThe applicant, Pest Control Office, is responsible for issuing certificates of authenticity re Banksy's artworks, and for selling his artworks and… [read post]
1 Mar 2019, 11:00 am
Why does this 20-year eviction matter? [read post]
1 Mar 2019, 9:15 am
In Law Society of Ontario v. [read post]
1 Mar 2019, 2:00 am
Supreme Court ruling in Gross v. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 6:41 pm
(Pix Credit: No Attention Paid on Human Rights When Implementing Economic Reforms! [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 1:36 pm
In re Hotels.com) and is deemed unregistrable. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 1:20 pm
In re Estate of Black, 125 Neb. 75, 249 N.W. 84 (1933). [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 12:24 pm
It does indeed seem that the statute -- and the list -- is focusing on stuff that caretakers might do. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 9:49 am
Engel v. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 4:08 am
” In Garza v. [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 4:58 pm
Applying these principles, the court in In re Marriage of Candiotti (Cal. [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 3:25 pm
At first glance, the new Executive Order 13858 does not seem to have many immediate ramifications for government contractors. [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 11:08 am
However, as an optimist, I can say that there does seem to be a faint light at the end of the tunnel that keeps glowing brighter. [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 7:52 am
Ruston v. [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 6:47 am
The Commission is now asking the court to order Musk to explain how a February 19 tweet that mischaracterized Tesla’s projected production numbers does not constitute contempt of court (SEC v. [read post]
