Search for: "J. C." Results 7461 - 7480 of 19,483
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Nov 2015, 7:00 am
  Moreover, all of that product would be infringing as the “product of the process” under Section 60(1)(c) of the Patents Act, so that subsequent dealing with it would also be an infringement. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 6:09 am by Pierre T. Nguyen
Ce qui importe, c’est la vue de face, car c’est ce qui sera visible par le consommateur. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 5:01 pm
(c) CMS clarified that the regulations in 42 CFR 411.357(t) regarding retention payments in underserved areas is correct. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 9:33 am
 Never Too Late 67  [week ending on Sunday 11 October] – Eponia rumours | Batmobile and copyright | EPO and human rights | Gucci v Guess | NOCN (Formerly National Open College Network) v Open College Network Credit4Learning | New CJEU reference on linking and copyright | Viennese waltz may be the last dance for Board members | Richard Perry v F H Brundle & Others | Safe harbour and the Schrems case | Economics of Domain names |… [read post]
1 Nov 2015, 11:09 am by Ed. Microjuris.com Puerto Rico
Hay que pensar en crear esos espacios para los niños y jóvenes porque eso es lo que están buscando, desde la comunidad, no esperar que salgan frustrados de la universidad”. [read post]
31 Oct 2015, 4:29 pm
”In contrast section 8 of the Representation Agreement Act provides:Test of incapability for standard provisions8  (1) An adult may make a representation agreement consisting of one or more of the standard provisions authorized by section 7 even though the adult is incapable of(a) making a contract,(b) managing his or her health care, personal care or legal matters, or(c) the routine management of his or her financial affairs.(2) In deciding whether an adult is… [read post]
29 Oct 2015, 9:42 am by Gage Dungy
  As noted in the new Labor Code section 233(c): (c) An employer shall not deny an employee the right to use sick leave or discharge, threaten to discharge, demote, suspend, or in any manner discriminate against an employee for using, or attempting to exercise the right to use, sick leave to attend to an illness or the preventive care of a family member, or for any other reason specified in subdivision (a) of Section 246.5. [read post]
29 Oct 2015, 6:56 am by Latham & Watkins LLP
The guidance follows the decision of the European Court of Justice (the ECJ) in Case C-362/14 – Maximillian Schrems v Data Protection Commissioner that Decision 2000/520 of the European Commission, which stated that Safe Harbor-certified US companies provide adequate protection for personal data transferred to them from the EU (the Safe Harbor Adequacy Decision), is invalid. [read post]