Search for: "John Does 1, 2, 3"
Results 7461 - 7480
of 7,891
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Apr 2012, 3:04 am
The full list of resolved complaints from last week: Mr Peter Reynolds v The Mail on Sunday, Clause 1, 20/04/2012; Samaritans, Mind, Rethink Mental Illness, Sane and PAPYRUS Prevention of Young Suicide v The Sun, Clause 5, 19/04/2012; Mr Adam Stephens v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 19/04/2012; Mr Peter Reynolds v Harborough Mail, Clause 1, 19/04/2012; Mrs Drene Brown v Scunthorpe Telegraph, Clause 1, 19/04/2012; A woman v Hastings and St Leonards Observer, Clause… [read post]
4 May 2022, 5:01 am
PATH 1: CRIMINAL PROSECUTION By charging Steve Bannon with contempt, the current Justice Department has gone farther in upholding Congress’s authority than any of its recent predecessors. [read post]
16 Feb 2021, 2:23 pm
App’x —-, 2020 WL 6165909, at *1-2 (2 [read post]
24 Sep 2022, 8:03 am
Why does the relationship have to be characterized by "exclusivity"? [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 4:28 pm
’ We ask: (1) whether the wrongful conduct occurred in the United States, and (2) whether the wrongful conduct had a substantial effect in the United States or upon United States citizens. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 5:46 pm
On the conservative/libertarian side of things, there is significant disagreement about whether Chief Justice John Roberts' opinion was a "good" or "bad" thing from a legal, policy and political perspective, but there appears to be pretty widespread agreement that the Chief switched his position very late in the game - going from the four conservative justices who wanted to kill the whole damn thing on the grounds that it was an unconstitutional… [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 8:55 am
Peak INPUT FROM FOUR SOURCES WITH THEIR THOUGHTS ON THE PROPOSED AMENDMENTS Comment 1. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 1:26 am
Lord Keen QC does not agree. 14:42: Lord Keen QC says the example shows the proroguing of Parliament was in fact where the Government did not have support of the House rather than for a King’s/Queens speech. [read post]
20 May 2018, 2:26 pm
Commenting on the case, John P. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 11:26 am
Factor #2: Improperly Secured Cargo Tow trucks secure cargo in several different ways. [read post]
30 Sep 2013, 7:20 pm
It constitutes the beginning, at least, of an intellectual GPS. 2. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 1:36 pm
’ paper by Graeme Clark SC (IP Down Under) Full Federal Court decision concerning brand reputation in context of ‘lookalike’ products and famous brands: Hansen Beverage Company v Bickfords (Australia) Pty Ltd (Mallesons Stephen Jaques) Federal Court holds that grace period applicable to a ‘parent patent’ is different to that of its divisional ‘child’: Mont Adventure Equipment v Phoenix Leisure Group (IP Down Under) Design valid… [read post]
7 Apr 2009, 12:30 pm
Hape claimed that the trial court erred by denying his motion to poll the jury to determine the effect of this unadmitted text message on their verdict, but the Court of Appeals of Indiana found that this denial was improper pursuant to Indiana Rule of Evidence 606(b), which indicates that Upon an inquiry into the validity of a verdict or indictment, a juror may not testify as to any matter or statement occuring during the course of the jury's deliberations or to the… [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 4:30 am
What does that mean? [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 8:47 am
Key Proposed Provisions EFCA has three basic components. 1. [read post]
30 Apr 2023, 6:00 am
One way to approach this question is via a typology--a scheme that divides the general and abstract concept of justice into component parts: (1) distributive justice, (2) corrective justice, (3) political justice, (4) procedural justice, and (5) retributive justice. [read post]
12 Dec 2022, 9:01 pm
” But nowhere does Article I, section 4 mention state courts or state judges, much less single out these actors for any special (negative) treatment. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 5:54 pm
byJill Paperno,Special Assistant Monroe County Public Defender In defending a client charged with criminal possession of a weapon it is important to be familiar with the various presumptions set forth in Penal Law 265.15. (1) Machine-guns – presence is presumptive evidence that all in the area possessed(2) Presence in stolen vehicle of items specified in the statute is presumptive evidence that all in the vehicle possessed(3) Presence in an automobile of items listed… [read post]
17 Aug 2021, 3:13 pm
” The options are to plead: (1) guilty; (2) not guilty; or (3) nolo contendere (with judicial approval). [read post]
Call for Papers: LASA2018: Latin American Studies in a Globalized World, 23-26 May, Barcelona, Spain
8 Aug 2017, 6:57 pm
I am pleased to pass along this call for papers for the Latin American Studies Association (LASA) 2018 Congress: Latin American Studies in a Globalized World, 23-26 May, Barcelona, Spain. [read post]
