Search for: "MATTER OF B T B" Results 7461 - 7480 of 19,798
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Mar 2015, 6:20 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Considering a future purchase wasn’t concrete enough to show a sufficient likelihood of being harmed in the future Damages: for 23(b)(3) certification, plaintiffs had to show that common issues predominated. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 7:19 am by John Elwood
  But probably the paperwork wasn’t in order. [read post]
17 Jan 2010, 10:20 pm
  I doubt that my daughters--ages 5 and 8--could tell you who Susan B. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 5:12 am by Brad Hokanson
Unger, Esq. is a tax lawyer whose practice is devoted exclusively to handling tax disputes and tax collection matters. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 3:45 pm by Eugene Volokh
Such a statute isn’t necessary to punish behavior such as that in the Clementi case, and it isn’t constitutional. [read post]
3 Jul 2011, 6:13 am by Maggie Sicklinger
”  (15 U.S.C.A. 1125(c)(4)(B)(2010) Although “Hermes-Paris” is visible on the Birkin bag closure, and Hermes-Paris is indisputably a famous mark, it can’t succeed on the dilution claim because it has not distinguished the word marks form the overall design. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 2:14 am by John Day
No matter what  grade you received in your "Litigation Skills" class. [read post]
6 Sep 2007, 4:01 am
" It's that difference that matters very much.The bottom line is that tax reform of any sort must elevate the common good over the special interests, no matter how entrenched the special interest provisions are or how accustomed the select few are to their special tax breaks. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 6:08 pm by Eric Turkewitz
– “not guilty”) b. even if there was speeding (which there wasn’t) – I was in a 65-mph zone NOT a 55 mph zone; and c. [read post]
28 May 2009, 1:23 pm
” * Grownups are presumed to have the knowledge of a high-school graduate with a B average. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 9:16 am by Elie Mystal
Your client won’t pay you your millions in legal fees.Firm B: You lose a major, high-profile case. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 7:30 am by Rebecca Tushnet
When the facts necessary to sustain jurisdiction implicate the merits, the proper result is to find jurisdiction and deal with the direct attack on the merits under Rule 12(b)(6) or on summary judgment. [read post]